Base de datos : MEDLINE
Búsqueda : (K01.316$ OR L01.143 OR L01.143.050 OR L01.143.230 OR L01.143.320 OR L01.143.320.800 OR L01.143.443 OR L01.143.474 OR L01.143.506.423.796 OR L01.143.506.423.906 OR L01.143.506.423.906.215 OR L01.399 OR L01.453) AND (L01.178.682$ or L01.737$) OR (L01.178 OR L01.178.590 OR L01.178.682 OR L01.178.682.099 OR L01.178.682.099.183 OR L01.178.682.099.308 OR L01.178.682.099.325 OR L01.178.682.099.434 OR L01.178.682.192 OR L01.178.682.192.836 OR L01.178.682.192.900 OR L01.178.682.389 OR L01.178.682.492 OR L01.178.682.608 OR L01.178.682.608.526 OR L01.178.682.759 OR L01.178.682.759.150 OR L01.178.682.829 OR L01.178.682.829.481 OR L01.178.682.829.678 OR L01.178.682.920 OR L01.178.820.090 OR L01.178.820.500 OR L01.178.820.900 OR L01.737 OR L01.737.150 OR L01.737.360 OR L01.737.471 OR L01.737.484 OR L01.737.498 OR L01.737.498.500 OR L01.737.498.550 OR L01.737.640 OR L01.737.684 OR L01.737.787 OR L01.737.813 OR L01.737.840) [Categoria DeCS]
Referencias encontradas : 123519 [refinar]
Mostrando: 1 .. 10   en el formato [Detallado]

página 1 de 12352 va a la página                         

  1 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28639928
[Au] Autor:Berquist TH
[Ad] Dirección:1 Editor in Chief ajrsubmit@arrs.org.
[Ti] Título:Peer Review: Is the Process Broken?
[So] Fuente:AJR Am J Roentgenol;209(1):1-2, 2017 07.
[Is] ISSN:1546-3141
[Cp] País de publicación:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Revisión de la Investigación por Pares
Revisión por Expertos
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE; COMMENT
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170622
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.2214/AJR.17.18430


  2 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28506319
[Au] Autor:Donini LM; Rosano A; Di Lazzaro L; Poggiogalle E; Lubrano C; Migliaccio S; Carbonelli M; Pinto A; Lenzi A
[Ad] Dirección:High Specialization Centre for the Care of Obesity ("CASCO"), Department of Experimental Medicine, Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology Section, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy. lorenzomaria.donini@uniroma1.it.
[Ti] Título:Validation of the Italian version of the Laval questionnaire: health-related quality of life in subjects with obesity.
[So] Fuente:Health Qual Life Outcomes;15(1):101, 2017 May 15.
[Is] ISSN:1477-7525
[Cp] País de publicación:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumen:BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated to increased risk of metabolic comorbidity as well as increased mortality. Notably, obesity is also associated to the impairment of the psychological status and of quality of life. Only three questionnaires are available in the Italian language evaluating the health-related quality of life in subjects with obesity. The aim of the present study was to test the validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Laval Questionnaire. METHODS: The original French version was translated into Italian and back-translated by a French native speaker. 273 subjects with obesity (Body Mass Index ≥ 30 kg/m ) were enrolled; the Italian version of the Laval Questionnaire and the O.R.Well-97 questionnaire were administered in order to assess health- related quality of life. The Laval questionnaire consists of 44 items distributed in 6 domains (symptoms, activity/mobility, personal hygiene/clothing, emotions, social interaction, sexual life). Disability and overall psychopathology levels were assessed through the TSD-OC test (SIO test for obesity correlated disabilities) and the SCL-90 (Symptom Checklist-90) questionnaire, respectively. To verify the validity of the Italian version, the analysis of internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity were performed. RESULTS: The observed proportion of agreement concordance of results was 50.2% with Cohen's K = 0.336 (CI 95%: 0.267-0.404), indicating a fair agreement between the two tests. Test-retest correlation was statistically significant (ρ = 0.82; p < 0.01); validity (standardized Chronbach's alpha) was considered reliable (α > 0.70). The analysis of construct validity showed a statistically significant association in terms of both total score (ρ = -0.66) and scores at each single domain (p < 0.01). A high correlation (p < 0.01) was observed between Laval questionnaire total and single domain scores and other related measures (Body Mass Index, TSD-OC scores, SCL-90 global severity index), revealing a high construct validity of the test. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of the Laval Questionnaire is a valid and reliable measure to assess the health-related quality of life in subjects with obesity.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Obesidad/psicología
Calidad de Vida
Encuestas y Cuestionarios
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Adulto
Personas con Discapacidad/psicología
Femenino
Humanos
Lenguaje
Masculino
Mediana Edad
Reproducibilidad de Resultados
Traducciones
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE; VALIDATION STUDIES
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170516
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0671-3


  3 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28448314
[Au] Autor:Zavell AE; Greenberg JN; Alam M; Armbrecht ES; Maher IA
[Ad] Dirección:*Department of Dermatology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; †Department of Dermatology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri; ‡Micrographic Surgery and Dermatologic Oncology Fellowship, Section of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; §Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Outcomes Research (SLUCOR), St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
[Ti] Título:A 30-Minute, Monthly, Live, Webinar-Based Journal Club Activity Alters the Self-Reported Behaviors of Dermatologic Surgeons.
[So] Fuente:Dermatol Surg;43(9):1144-1147, 2017 Sep.
[Is] ISSN:1524-4725
[Cp] País de publicación:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumen:BACKGROUND: Journal clubs provide a way to communicate advances in recent literature. In outpatient surgical subspecialties, such as dermatologic surgery, physicians may face challenges in finding or attending meetings pertinent to their practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of a live web-based journal club in dermatologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monthly 30-minute journal club sessions covering 5 to 6 scholarly articles. Anonymous surveys were used to evaluate the utility and self-reported learning associated with each meeting. RESULTS: From December 2012 to February 2015, 117 articles were reviewed. Survey data were acquired monthly, apart from 5 months of missing data. On average, the survey response rate was 37% (range: 7%-82%), with an average of 17 participants per monthly session (range: 9-25). The mean monthly usefulness score was 83.7 (101-point scale), with participants scoring their likelihood of returning in the future as 96.2 (0 = not likely, 100 = extremely likely). At each session, a mean of 68% of participants felt that at least one article would change their practice of medicine. CONCLUSION: A monthly online and telephonic journal club may be a practical and effective way to inform dermatologic surgeons of new developments in high impact literature and may influence improvements in individual practice.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Dermatólogos/psicología
Educación Médica Continua/métodos
Internet
Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina
Autoinforme
Cirujanos/psicología
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Humanos
Internado y Residencia
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170427
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001160


  4 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28445696
[Au] Autor:Cheng KL; Dodson TB; Egbert MA; Susarla SM
[Ad] Dirección:Dental Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Washington School of Dentistry and the Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
[Ti] Título:Which Factors Affect Citation Rates in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Literature?
[So] Fuente:J Oral Maxillofac Surg;75(7):1313-1318, 2017 Jul.
[Is] ISSN:1531-5053
[Cp] País de publicación:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumen:PURPOSE: Citation rate is one of several tools to measure academic productivity. The purposes of this study were to estimate and identify factors associated with citation rates in the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS) literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study of publications in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS), International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (IJOMS), and Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, and Oral Radiology (OOOO) from January through December 2012. The predictor variables were author- and article-specific factors. The outcome variable was the citation rate, defined as the total number of citations for each article over a 4-year period. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression statistics were computed. RESULTS: The authors identified 993 articles published during 2012. The mean number of citations at 4 years after publication was 5.6 ± 5.3 (median, 4). In bivariate analyses, several author- and article-specific factors were associated with citation rates. In a multiple regression model adjusting for potential confounders and effect modifiers, first author H-index, number of authors, journal, OMS focus area, and Oxford level of evidence were significantly associated with citation rate (P ≤ .002). CONCLUSION: The authors identified 5 factors associated with citation rates in the OMS literature. These factors should be considered in context when evaluating citation-based metrics for OMS. Studies that focus on core OMS procedures (eg, dentoalveolar surgery, dental implant surgery), are published in specialty-specific journals (eg, JOMS or IJOMS), and have higher levels of evidence are more likely to be cited.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Edición/estadística & datos numéricos
Cirugía Bucal
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Estudios Longitudinales
Estudios Retrospectivos
Factores de Tiempo
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; D; IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170426
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  5 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28418091
[Au] Autor:O'Connor EM; Nason GJ; O'Kelly F; Manecksha RP; Loeb S
[Ad] Dirección:Department of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
[Ti] Título:Newsworthiness vs scientific impact: are the most highly cited urology papers the most widely disseminated in the media?
[So] Fuente:BJU Int;120(3):441-454, 2017 Sep.
[Is] ISSN:1464-410X
[Cp] País de publicación:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumen:OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a correlation exists between newsworthiness (Altmetric score) and scientific impact markers, such as citation analysis, impact factors, and levels of evidence. METHODS: The top five most cited articles for the year 2014 and 2015 from the top 10 ranking urology journals (Scientific Impact Group) were identified. The top 50 articles each in 2014 and 2015 were identified from Altmetric support based on media activity (Media Impact Group). We determined the number of citations that these articles received in the scientific literature, and calculated correlations between citations with Altmetric scores. RESULTS: In the Scientific Impact Group, the mean number of citations per article was 37.6, and the most highly cited articles were oncology guidelines. The mean Altmetric score in these articles was 14.8. There was a weak positive correlation between citations and Altmetric score (r = 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.52, P < 0.001). In the Media Impact Group, the mean Altmetric score was 121.1 and most widely shared articles all related to sexual medicine. In this group, the mean number of citations was 9.7 and there was a weak negative correlation between Altmetric score and citations (r = -0.20, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: The top articles based on Altmetric scores were not highly cited, suggesting that publications receiving the most media attention may not be the most scientifically rigorous, or that this audience places greater value on different subjects than the scientific community.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Bibliometría
Factor de Impacto de la Revista
Urología
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170418
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1111/bju.13881


  6 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
[PMID]:28365937
[Au] Autor:Wang X; Qi X; Ming X; Wang L; Wang Y; Zhao X
[Ad] Dirección:West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, PR China.
[Ti] Título:Prognostic value of cyclin E expression in patients with ovarian cancer: a Meta-analysis.
[So] Fuente:J BUON;22(1):64-71, 2017 Jan-Feb.
[Is] ISSN:1107-0625
[Cp] País de publicación:Greece
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumen:PURPOSE: Cell cycle is mainly mediated by cyclins, cyclin- dependent kinases (CDK), and CDK inhibitors. Cyclin E is the main regulator for transition from G1 to S phase, and is involved in cancer pathogenesis, progression and metastasis. Nevertheless, there is still a controversy of the prognostic value of cyclin E overexpression in ovarian cancer patients. This meta-analysis is the first study aimed at analyzing the effect of cyclin E overexpression on the prognosis of ovarian cancer. METHODS: By systematically searching the PUBMED, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases for relevant articles with publication dates up to January 2016 and selection following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 studies with 1470 patients were enrolled in our meta-analysis. The overall survival (OS) of patients with cyclin E overexpression was calculated using hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The studies were categorized according to the author and year, demographic data in each study, ovarian cancer related information, and cyclin E cut-off value. RESULTS: Cyclin E overexpression in ovarian cancer was a poor prognostic factor with statistical significance for OS (HR=1.48, 95%CI: 1.12,1.85). Using confunnel, we found no publication bias in our analysis. CONCLUSION: Cyclin E might be considered as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer, as supported by our meta-analysis. However, more high-quality studies should be conducted to find better clinical use of cyclin E in ovarian cancer.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Ciclina E/análisis
Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Adulto
Estudios Transversales
Femenino
Humanos
Mediana Edad
Neoplasias Ováricas/química
Pronóstico
Sesgo de Publicación
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE; META-ANALYSIS
[Nm] Nombre de substancia:
0 (Cyclin E)
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170402
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  7 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28161985
[Au] Autor:Tampin B; Bohne T; Callan M; Kvia M; Melsom Myhre A; Neoh EC; Bharat C; Slater H
[Ad] Dirección:a Department of Physiotherapy , Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital , Perth , Western Australia.
[Ti] Título:Reliability of the English version of the painDETECT questionnaire.
[So] Fuente:Curr Med Res Opin;33(4):741-748, 2017 Apr.
[Is] ISSN:1473-4877
[Cp] País de publicación:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumen:BACKGROUND: The painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) has been used widely for the identification of neuropathic pain (NeP); however, the reliability of the English version of the PD-Q has never been investigated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the reliability of the PD-Q pre- (T0) and immediately post- (T1) clinical consultation and at one-week follow-up (T2). METHODS: We recruited 157 patients attending a Neurosurgery Spinal Clinic and Pain Management Department. Minor changes to PD-Q instructions were made to facilitate patient understanding; however, no changes to individual items or scoring were made. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the reliability of PD-Q total scores between T0-T1 and T0-T2; weighted kappa (κ) was used to assess the agreement of PD-Q classifications (unlikely NeP, ambiguous, likely NeP) between all time-points. To ensure stability of clinical pain, patients scoring ≤2 or ≥6 on the Patient Global Impression Scale (PGIC) at T2 were excluded from the T0-T2 analysis. RESULTS: Accounting for missing data and exclusions (change in PGIC score), data for 136 individuals (mean [SD] age: 56.8 [15.2]; 54% male) was available, of whom n = 129 were included in the T0-T1 and n = 69 in the T0-T2 comparisons. There was almost perfect agreement between the PD-Q total scores at T0-T1 time-points (ICC 0.911; 95% CI: 0.882-0.941) and substantial agreement at T0-T2 (ICC 0.792; 95% CI: 0.703-0.880). PD-Q classifications demonstrated substantial agreement for T0-T1 (weighted κ: 0.771; 95% CI: 0.683-0.858) and for T0-T2 (weighted κ: 0.691; 95% CI: 0.553-0.830). Missing data was accounted in 13% of our cohort and over 42% of our patients drew multiple pain areas on the PD-Q body chart. CONCLUSION: The English version of the PD-Q is reliable as a screening tool for NeP. The validity of the questionnaire is still in question and has to be investigated in future studies.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Neuralgia/diagnóstico
Dimensión del Dolor
Encuestas y Cuestionarios
Traducciones
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Adulto
Anciano
Australia/epidemiología
Estudios Transversales
Femenino
Humanos
Masculino
Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
Mediana Edad
Dimensión del Dolor/métodos
Dimensión del Dolor/normas
Mejoramiento de la Calidad
Reproducibilidad de Resultados
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170206
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1080/03007995.2017.1278682


  8 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28125269
[Au] Autor:Taylor DB
[Ad] Dirección:1 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington St, Perth, WA 6001, Australia.
[Ti] Título:JOURNAL CLUB: Plagiarism in Manuscripts Submitted to the AJR: Development of an Optimal Screening Algorithm and Management Pathways.
[So] Fuente:AJR Am J Roentgenol;208(4):712-720, 2017 Apr.
[Is] ISSN:1546-3141
[Cp] País de publicación:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumen:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of plagiarism in a sample of manuscripts submitted to the AJR using CrossCheck, develop an algorithm to identify significant plagiarism, and formulate management pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 110 of 1610 (6.8%) manuscripts submitted to AJR in 2014 in the categories of Original Research or Review were analyzed using CrossCheck and manual assessment. The overall similarity index (OSI), highest similarity score from a single source, whether duplication was from single or multiple origins, journal section, and presence or absence of referencing the source were recorded. The criteria outlined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors were the reference standard for identifying manuscripts containing plagiarism. Statistical analysis was used to develop a screening algorithm to maximize sensitivity and specificity for the detection of plagiarism. Criteria for defining the severity of plagiarism and management pathways based on the severity of the plagiarism were determined. RESULTS: Twelve manuscripts (10.9%) contained plagiarism. Nine had an OSI excluding quotations and references of less than 20%. In seven, the highest similarity score from a single source was less than 10%. The highest similarity score from a single source was the work of the same author or authors in nine. Common sections for duplication were the Materials and Methods, Discussion, and abstract. Referencing the original source was lacking in 11. Plagiarism was undetected at submission in five of these 12 articles; two had been accepted for publication. The most effective screening algorithm was to average the OSI including quotations and references and the highest similarity score from a single source and to submit manuscripts with an average value of more than 12% for further review. CONCLUSION: The current methods for detecting plagiarism are suboptimal. A new screening algorithm is proposed.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Políticas Editoriales
Modelos Organizacionales
Revisión de la Investigación por Pares/métodos
Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto
Plagio
Edición/organización & administración
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Algoritmos
Manuscritos Médicos
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1704
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170126
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.2214/AJR.16.17208


  9 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo SciELO Brasil
[PMID]:28117473
[Au] Autor:Kawaguchi YM; Nawa RK; Figueiredo TB; Martins L; Pires-Neto RC
[Ad] Dirección:Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.
[Ti] Título:Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score and ICU Mobility Scale: translation into Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation for use in Brazil.
[So] Fuente:J Bras Pneumol;42(6):429-434, 2016 Nov-Dec.
[Is] ISSN:1806-3756
[Cp] País de publicación:Brazil
[La] Idioma:eng; por
[Ab] Resumen:Objective:: To translate the Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score and the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) into Portuguese, creating versions that are cross-culturally adapted for use in Brazil, and to determine the interobserver agreement and reliability for both versions. Methods:: The processes of translation and cross-cultural validation consisted in the following: preparation, translation, reconciliation, synthesis, back-translation, review, approval, and pre-test. The Portuguese-language versions of both instruments were then used by two researchers to evaluate critically ill ICU patients. Weighted kappa statistics and Bland-Altman plots were used in order to verify interobserver agreement for the two instruments. In each of the domains of the instruments, interobserver reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The correlation between the instruments was assessed by Spearman's correlation test. Results:: The study sample comprised 103 patients-56 (54%) of whom were male-with a mean age of 52 ± 18 years. The main reason for ICU admission (in 44%) was respiratory failure. Both instruments showed excellent interobserver agreement ( > 0.90) and reliability ( > 0.90) in all domains. Interobserver bias was low for the IMS and the Perme Score (-0.048 ± 0.350 and -0.06 ± 0.73, respectively). The 95% CIs for the same instruments ranged from -0.73 to 0.64 and -1.50 to 1.36, respectively. There was also a strong positive correlation between the two instruments (r = 0.941; p < 0.001). Conclusions:: In their versions adapted for use in Brazil, both instruments showed high interobserver agreement and reliability. Objetivo:: Realizar a tradução e a validação cultural para a língua portuguesa falada no Brasil e determinar a concordância e a confiabilidade dos instrumentos Perme Intensive Care Unit Mobility Score (designado Perme Escore) e ICU Mobility Scale (designada Escala de Mobilidade em UTI, EMU). Métodos:: Os processos de tradução e adaptação cultural seguiram as seguintes etapas: preparação, tradução, reconciliação, síntese, tradução reversa, revisão, aprovação e pré-teste. Após esses processos, as versões em português dos dois instrumentos foram utilizadas por dois pesquisadores na avaliação de pacientes críticos em UTI. O índice kappa ponderado e a disposição gráfica de Bland-Altman foram utilizados para verificar a concordância entre os instrumentos. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach foi utilizado para verificar a confiabilidade entre as respostas dos avaliadores dentro de cada domínio dos instrumentos. A correlação entre os instrumentos foi verificada pelo teste de correlação de Spearman. Resultados:: A amostra foi composta por 103 pacientes, sendo a maioria homens (n = 56; 54%), com média de idade = 52 ± 18 anos. O principal motivo de internação nas UTIs foi insuficiência respiratória (em 44%). Os dois instrumentos apresentaram excelente concordância interobservador (> 0,90) e confiabilidade ( > 0,90) em todos os domínios. Constatou-se um baixo viés interobservador na EMU e no Perme Escore (-0,048 ± 0,350 e -0,06 ± 0,73, respectivamente). Os IC95% para os mesmos instrumentos variaram, respectivamente, de -0,73 a 0,64 e de -1,50 a 1,36, respectivamente. Além disso, verificou-se alta correlação positiva entre os dois instrumentos (r = 0,941; p < 0,001). Conclusões:: As versões dos dois instrumentos apresentaram alta concordância e confiabilidade interobservador.
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Enfermedad Crítica/clasificación
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
Modalidades de Fisioterapia/normas
Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Adulto
Anciano
Brasil
Comparación Transcultural
Femenino
Humanos
Lenguaje
Masculino
Mediana Edad
Limitación de la Movilidad
Variaciones Dependientes del Observador
Reproducibilidad de Resultados
Traducciones
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:JOURNAL ARTICLE; VALIDATION STUDIES
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170124
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  10 / 123519 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record
selecciona
para imprimir
Fotocopia
Texto completo SciELO Brasil
[PMID]:28117466
[Au] Autor:Genta PR
[Ad] Dirección:. Laboratório do Sono, Disciplina de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.
[Ti] Título:The JBP and sleep medicine.
[So] Fuente:J Bras Pneumol;42(6):401, 2016 Nov-Dec.
[Is] ISSN:1806-3756
[Cp] País de publicación:Brazil
[La] Idioma:eng; por
[Mh] Términos MeSH primario: Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto
Medicina del Sueño
[Mh] Términos MeSH secundario: Brasil
Humanos
Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/normas
[Pt] Tipo de publicación:EDITORIAL
[Em] Mes de ingreso:1708
[Cu] Fecha actualización por clase:170831
[Lr] Fecha última revisión:170831
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Fecha de ingreso para procesamiento:170124
[St] Status:MEDLINE



página 1 de 12352 va a la página                         
   


Refinar la búsqueda
  Base de datos : MEDLINE Formulario avanzado   

    Buscar en el campo  
1  
2
3
 
           



Search engine: iAH v2.6 powered by WWWISIS

BIREME/OPS/OMS - Centro Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Información en Ciencias de la Salud