[PMID]: | 28238321 |
[Au] Autor: | Boujenah J; Fleury C; Pharisien I; Benbara A; Tigaizin A; Bricou A; Carbillon L |
[Ad] Endereço: | Pôle femme et enfant, groupe hospitalier universitaire Paris Seine-Saint-Denis, site Jean-Verdier, avenue du 14-Juillet, 93140 Bondy, France; UFR SMBH, université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris cité, 93000 Bobigny, France. Electronic address: jeremy.boujenah@gmail.com. |
[Ti] Título: | [Cord accident after external cephalic version: Reality or mostly myth?] |
[Ti] Título: | Accident funiculaire après version par manÅ“uvre externe : mythe ou réalité ?. |
[So] Source: | Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol;45(1):9-14, 2017 Jan. |
[Is] ISSN: | 2468-7189 |
[Cp] País de publicação: | France |
[La] Idioma: | fre |
[Ab] Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: To study the occurrence of cords accident (nuchal cords, prolapse, and braces) after external cephalic version according to its failure or success. METHODS: Retrospective study between 1998-2015 comparing in the cord accident diagnosed at delivery (by midwife or doctors according to mode of delivery): Patients with attempt ECV: Group 1 cephalic presentation after successful ECV with trial of labor, and Group 2 failed ECV followed by elective cesarean or trial of labor. Patients with no attempt ECV Group 3 spontaneous cephalic presentation matching for delivery date, maternal age, parity, body mass index, and delivery history with group 1, Group 4 Breech presentation without attempt ECV with trial of labor. RESULTS: A total of 776 women with breech presentation were included (198 in group 1, 446 in group 2, 396 in group 3 and 118 in group 4). The prevalence of cord accident did not differ according to ECV attempt (17.08 % versus 18.9 %), to cephalic presentation (group 1: 24.7 % versus group 3: 25 %) and to breech presentation (group 2: 16.9 % versus group 4: 17.2 %). The trial of labor after failed ECV did not increase the risk of cord accident when compared with elective cesarean (17.4 % versus 16 %). A prolapse cord was only observed after trial of labor, i.e. in groups 1, 2 and 4 without difference (respectively 1, 0.8 and 1.7 %). In each group, the rate of cesarean was not different according to the presence of nuchal cord. CONCLUSION: Success or failed External cephalic version is not associated with an increased risk of cord accident. |
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: |
Apresentação Pélvica/terapia Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia Cordão Umbilical Versão Fetal/efeitos adversos
|
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: |
Cesárea Feminino Seres Humanos Cordão Nucal/epidemiologia Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia Gravidez Prolapso Estudos Retrospectivos Fatores de Risco Prova de Trabalho de Parto
|
[Pt] Tipo de publicação: | JOURNAL ARTICLE |
[Em] Mês de entrada: | 1710 |
[Cu] Atualização por classe: | 171011 |
[Lr] Data última revisão:
| 171011 |
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista: | IM |
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento: | 170228 |
[St] Status: | MEDLINE |
|
|