|
[PMID]: | 28323084 |
[Au] Autor: | Hunt EA; Duval-Arnould JM; Chime NO; Jones K; Rosen M; Hollingsworth M; Aksamit D; Twilley M; Camacho C; Nogee DP; Jung J; Nelson-McMillan K; Shilkofski N; Perretta JS |
[Ad] Endereço: | Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Division of Health Sciences Informatics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Johns Hopkins Medicine Simu |
[Ti] Título: | Integration of in-hospital cardiac arrest contextual curriculum into a basic life support course: a randomized, controlled simulation study. |
[So] Source: | Resuscitation;114:127-132, 2017 May. | [Is] ISSN: | 1873-1570 |
[Cp] País de publicação: | Ireland |
[La] Idioma: | eng |
[Ab] Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare resuscitation performance on simulated in-hospital cardiac arrests after traditional American Heart Association (AHA) Healthcare Provider Basic Life Support course (TradBLS) versus revised course including in-hospital skills (HospBLS). DESIGN: This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled curriculum evaluation. SETTING: Johns Hopkins Medicine Simulation Center. SUBJECTS: One hundred twenty-two first year medical students were divided into fifty-nine teams. INTERVENTION: HospBLS course of identical length, containing additional content contextual to hospital environments, taught utilizing Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure during simulated cardiac arrest scenarios was chest compression fraction (CCF) and secondary outcome measures included metrics of high quality resuscitation. MAIN RESULTS: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest HospBLS teams had larger CCF: [69% (65-74) vs. 58% (53-62), p<0.001] and were faster than TradBLS at initiating compressions: [median (IQR): 9s (7-12) vs. 22s (17.5-30.5), p<0.001]. In-hospital cardiac arrest HospBLS teams had larger CCF: [73% (68-75) vs. 50% (43-54), p<0.001] and were faster to initiate compressions: [10s (6-11) vs. 36s (27-63), p<0.001]. All teams utilized the hospital AED to defibrillate within 180s per AHA guidelines [HospBLS: 122s (103-149) vs. TradBLS: 139s (117-172), p=0.09]. HospBLS teams performed more hospital-specific maneuvers to optimize compressions, i.e. utilized: CPR button to flatten bed: [7/30 (23%) vs. 0/29 (0%), p=0.006], backboard: [21/30 (70%) vs. 5/29 (17%), p<0.001], stepstool: [28/30 (93%) vs. 8/29 (28%), p<0.001], lowered bedrails: [28/30 (93%) vs. 10/29 (34%), p<0.001], connected oxygen appropriately: [26/30 (87%) vs. 1/29 (3%), p<0.001] and used oral airway and/or two-person bagging when traditional bag-mask-ventilation unsuccessful: [30/30 (100%) vs. 0/29 (0%), p<0.001]. CONCLUSION: A hospital focused BLS course utilizing RCDP was associated with improved performance on hospital-specific quality measures compared with the traditional AHA course. |
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: |
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/educação Cardioversão Elétrica/métodos Parada Cardíaca/terapia Massagem Cardíaca/normas Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia Treinamento por Simulação/métodos
|
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: |
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/normas Currículo Feminino Seres Humanos Masculino Estudos Prospectivos Estudantes de Medicina Fatores de Tempo
|
[Pt] Tipo de publicação: | JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL |
[Em] Mês de entrada: | 1711 |
[Cu] Atualização por classe: | 171109 |
[Lr] Data última revisão:
| 171109 |
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista: | IM |
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento: | 170322 |
[St] Status: | MEDLINE |
|
|
|