[PMID]: | 29245347 |
[Au] Autor: | Kang SK; Cho KS; Kang DH; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee JY |
[Ad] Endereço: | aDepartment of Urology, Severance HospitalbDepartment of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, SeoulcDepartment of Urology, Inha University School of Medicine, IncheondDepartment of Urology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, YongineDepartment of Urology, Severance Check-Up, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea. |
[Ti] Título: | Systematic review and meta-analysis to compare success rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm: An update. |
[So] Source: | Medicine (Baltimore);96(49):e9119, 2017 Dec. |
[Is] ISSN: | 1536-5964 |
[Cp] País de publicação: | United States |
[La] Idioma: | eng |
[Ab] Resumo: | BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing stone-free rates between retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), using updated, more reliable evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing RIRS and PCNL for >2 cm stones were identified from electronic databases. Stone-free rates for the procedures were compared by qualitative and quantitative syntheses (meta-analyses). Outcome variables are shown as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Eleven articles were included in this study. Most recently published studies exhibited relatively low quality during quality assessment. For the meta-analysis comparing success (stone-free) rates between PCNL and RIRS, the forest plot using the random-effects model showed an RR of 1.11 (95% CI 1.02-1.21, P < .014) favoring PCNL. After determining the among-study heterogeneity, subgroup analysis was performed of 9 studies with less heterogeneity: the stone-free rate of PCNL was superior to that of RIRS using a fixed-effect model (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14, P < .019) for these studies. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS can be a safe and effective procedure for selected patients with large renal stones. However, in this meta-analysis, the postoperative stone-free rate of PCNL was higher than that of RIRS in patients with >2 cm renal stones. |
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: |
Cálculos Renais/cirurgia Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
|
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: |
Seres Humanos Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/métodos Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
|
[Pt] Tipo de publicação: | JOURNAL ARTICLE; META-ANALYSIS; REVIEW |
[Em] Mês de entrada: | 1801 |
[Cu] Atualização por classe: | 180105 |
[Lr] Data última revisão:
| 180105 |
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista: | AIM; IM |
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento: | 171217 |
[St] Status: | MEDLINE |
[do] DOI: | 10.1097/MD.0000000000009119 |
|
|