Base de dados : MEDLINE
Pesquisa : E06.658 [Categoria DeCS]
Referências encontradas : 6526 [refinar]
Mostrando: 1 .. 10   no formato [Detalhado]

página 1 de 653 ir para página                         

  1 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29364823
[Au] Autor:Keim RG; Gottlieb EL; Vogels DS; Vogels PB
[Ad] Endereço:Editor, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. editor@jco-online.com.
[Ti] Título:2017 JCO orthodontic practice study: Part 3 practice growth and staff data.
[So] Source:J Clin Orthod;51(12):773-785, 2017 Dec.
[Is] ISSN:0022-3875
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Recursos Humanos em Odontologia/estatística & dados numéricos
Ortodontia/organização & administração
Administração da Prática Odontológica/organização & administração
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Recursos Humanos em Odontologia/economia
Seres Humanos
Renda
Ortodontia/economia
Administração da Prática Odontológica/economia
Área de Atuação Profissional
Salários e Benefícios
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1803
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180308
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180308
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180125
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  2 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29364822
[Au] Autor:Keim RG
[Ad] Endereço:Senior Editor, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics.
[Ti] Título:Anticipating the puck.
[So] Source:J Clin Orthod;51(12):772, 2017 Dec.
[Is] ISSN:0022-3875
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Padrões de Prática Médica
Inquéritos e Questionários
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Ortodontia
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:EDITORIAL
[Em] Mês de entrada:1803
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180308
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180308
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180125
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  3 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29232201
[Au] Autor:Klempner L; Epstein A
[Ad] Endereço:People and Practice, LLC, New York, NY. leon@pplpractice.com.
[Ti] Título:The future is now: How millennials, tech, and a chess-playing computer are changing orthodontics.
[So] Source:J Clin Orthod;51(10):661-666, 2017 Oct.
[Is] ISSN:0022-3875
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Marketing de Serviços de Saúde
Ortodontia
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Inteligência Artificial
Seres Humanos
Software
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180118
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180118
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171213
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  4 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29232199
[Au] Autor:Keim RG; Gottlieb EL; Vogels DS; Vogels PB
[Ad] Endereço:Editor, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. editor@jco-online.com.
[Ti] Título:2017 JCO Orthodontic Practice Study.
[So] Source:J Clin Orthod;51(10):639-656, 2017 Oct.
[Is] ISSN:0022-3875
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Ortodontia/economia
Administração da Prática Odontológica/estatística & dados numéricos
Padrões de Prática Odontológica/estatística & dados numéricos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Renda
Política Organizacional
Ortodontia/estatística & dados numéricos
Inquéritos e Questionários
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180118
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180118
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171213
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  5 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29287655
[Au] Autor:Prevezanos P; Tsolakis AI; Christou P
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Electronic address: orthopiraeus@gmail.com.
[Ti] Título:Highly cited orthodontic articles from 2000 to 2015.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;153(1):61-69, 2018 Jan.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Identification of highly cited articles based on the h-index and its properties is important for the evaluation of the past, present, and future of any research discipline. In this study, we aimed to identify the h-classic articles in orthodontics. METHODS: One search on the Web of Science identified all articles from 2000 to 2015 in the 89 journals indexed by the 2015 InCites Journal Citation Reports in the scientific area "dentistry, oral surgery, and medicine." A second search was performed in the Web of Science using all mesh terms related to orthodontics. Then, we applied the h-classic method to select the recent articles with the greatest scientific impact in orthodontics. RESULTS: Eighty articles were considered as h-classic articles. They were published in 20 of the 89 dental journals of the 2015 InCites Journal Citation Reports list. Only 36 articles appeared in orthodontic journals: 23 in the American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics (28.8%), 7 in The Angle Orthodontist (8.8%), and 6 in European Journal of Orthodontics (7.5%). Thirty-eight articles originated from Europe, 28 from the Americas, and 14 from the Middle East and Asia. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of fundamental orthodontic research is published in nonorthodontic journals showing that our field is currently limited, and interactions with other research fields should be sought to increase orthodontic research importance and appeal.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Ortodontia
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Fatores de Tempo
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180112
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180112
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171231
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  6 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29287641
[Au] Autor:Al-Jewair T; Stellrecht E; Lewandowski L; Chakaki R
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY. Electronic address: thikriat@buffalo.edu.
[Ti] Título:American Association of Orthodontists Foundation Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection in the orthodontic literature-use and trends: A systematic review.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;153(1):15-25.e10, 2018 Jan.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: The American Association of Orthodontists Foundation (AAOF) Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection is a digital repository of records from 9 craniofacial growth study collections in the United States and Canada. The purposes of this article were to describe the use of materials from the AAOF Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection in the orthodontic literature in comparative and follow-up studies, and to analyze trends before and after the project's launch in 2009. METHODS: An electronic search without date or language restriction was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, and CINAHL. Grey literature resources and the bibliographies of the selected studies were also consulted. Three independent reviewers assessed the studies for inclusion. The criteria were human subjects of any age, sex, and ethnicity; at least 1 of the 9 AAOF legacy collections used as either the main sample population or the comparison or control; and orthodontic outcomes assessed. Data were analyzed using STATA software (version 14.2; StataCorp, College Station, Tex). RESULTS: A total of 199 studies (127 follow-up, 72 comparative) were included. The most commonly used collection in comparative studies was the Michigan Growth sample. The number of published studies more than doubled after the AAOF Legacy Collection project testing and launch in 2009. The increase continued through 2010 to 2014, during which there was a trend to use multiple collections. The Burlington Growth collection was the most commonly used collection for follow-up studies. The overall use of the legacy collection showed a small increase in published studies after 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The overall numbers of published studies in the comparative and follow-up categories increased after 2009, reflecting the efforts of the AAOF team and collection curators to make the records available worldwide. Further research should consider studying each collection to identify utilization predictors.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Bases de Dados Factuais
Desenvolvimento Maxilofacial
Ortodontia
Crânio/crescimento & desenvolvimento
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Adulto
Canadá
Criança
Pré-Escolar
Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências
Bases de Dados Factuais/utilização
Feminino
Fundações
Seres Humanos
Lactente
Masculino
Meia-Idade
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180112
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180112
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171231
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  7 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29269824
[Au] Autor:Madurantakam P; Kumar S
[Ad] Endereço:Department of General Practice, VCU School of Dentistry, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
[Ti] Título:Are there more adverse effects with lingual orthodontics?
[So] Source:Evid Based Dent;18(4):101-102, 2017 12 22.
[Is] ISSN:1476-5446
[Cp] País de publicação:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and LILACS database, review of references cited in included articles and a manual search of leading orthodontic journals. No language restrictions were imposed in the search. Study authors were contacted when necessary.Study selectionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) in healthy patients that directly compared the adverse effects following treatment using buccal and lingual appliances. Studies involving single arch or dual arch appliances were considered. Studies on patients with systemic diseases, animal studies and in vitro studies were excluded. The primary outcomes of interest to the authors were a list of adverse effects: pain, caries, eating and speech difficulties and oral hygiene.Data extraction and synthesisTwo authors reviewed the titles and abstracts of all studies identified through the search without blinding to names of authors or publication dates. Selected articles from searches were evaluated independently by two authors against established inclusion criteria, disagreements were resolved by consensus or by consulting a third author. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool (randomised trials) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomised studies. The level of agreement between the authors was assessed using the Cohen kappa statistic. A meta-analysis was performed to provide pooled effect estimate (expressed as odds ratio) as well as 95% confidence interval. The outcomes of interest were pain, caries, eating difficulties, speech difficulties and deficient oral hygiene. Heterogeneity was quantified using I2 statistic and potential causes explored. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot.ResultsEight articles were included; three RCTs and five CCTs. One RCT was considered to be at high risk of bias, one moderate risk and one low risk. Of the non-randomised studies, four were low risk and one was high risk of bias. Six studies involving a total of 131 patients were included in a meta-analysis. The lingual appliance was associated with significant pain in the tongue (OR=28.32, 95% CI 8.6-93.28), difficulty in maintaining oral hygiene (OR=3.49, 95%CI 1.02-11.95) and greater speech difficulty (OR = 9.39, 95% CI 3.78-23.33) compared to buccal appliances. On the other hand, patients with lingual appliances had decreased pain in the lips and cheeks. There was no difference between the two appliances with regards to caries risk.ConclusionsLimited available evidence indicates that lingual orthodontic appliances are associated with increased pain in the tongue, speech difficulties and difficulty in maintaining oral hygiene.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Aparelhos Ortodônticos
Ortodontia
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Assistência Odontológica
Seres Humanos
Boca
Língua
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; COMMENT
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180101
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180101
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171223
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1038/sj.ebd.6401266


  8 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29173855
[Au] Autor:Al Makhmari SA; Kaklamanos EG; Athanasiou AE
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
[Ti] Título:Short-term and long-term effectiveness of powered toothbrushes in promoting periodontal health during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;152(6):753-766.e7, 2017 Dec.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Although powered toothbrushes have been reported to reduce gingivitis more than manual toothbrushes in the general population, the evidence regarding orthodontic patients has been inconclusive. Thus, we aimed to compare their effectiveness in relation to any available parameter regarding oral health in orthodontic patients with fixed appliances. METHODS: Searches without restrictions for published and unpublished literature and hand searching took place up to August 2017. Oral-health relevant data from randomized controlled trials of at least 4-weeks duration comparing powered and manual tooth brushing without supervision were reviewed. Data were classified as short term (assessments at 1-3 months) and long term (assessments at >3 months), and the random-effects method was used to combine treatment effects. Individual study risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: The initially identified articles were finally reduced to 9 randomized controlled trials investigating the periodontal health in 434 patients. Eight studies followed patients up to 3 months, and 1 up to 12 months during treatment. One study was at low and the rest at unclear risk of bias. Overall, in the short term, there was low-quality evidence that powered toothbrushes provide a statistically significant benefit compared with manual brushing with regard to the gingival index (weighted mean difference, -0.079; 95% confidence interval, -0.146 to -0.012; P = 0.021) and indexes assessing gingival bleeding (standardized mean difference, -0.637; 95% confidence interval, -1.092 to -0.183; P = 0.006). In the long term, only 1 available study showed a statistically significant benefit of powered over manual toothbrushes with regard to gingival index and bleeding. No differences were observed in probing pocket depth and relative attachment loss. For the rotation-oscillation brushes that involved the greatest body of evidence, statistically significant reductions in gingival index and bleeding were demonstrated only in the long-term study. No included study provided quantified measurements regarding caries activity. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, powered toothbrushes may promote gingival health better than manual toothbrushes in orthodontic patients. However, no type demonstrated clear superiority. Better study standardization and reporting in longer follow-up studies are necessary to elucidate the clinical relevance of these results.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Saúde Bucal
Ortodontia
Doenças Periodontais/prevenção & controle
Escovação Dentária/instrumentação
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Dispositivos para o Cuidado Bucal Domiciliar
Seres Humanos
Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
Fatores de Tempo
Resultado do Tratamento
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; META-ANALYSIS; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1712
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171211
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171211
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171128
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  9 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29068938
[Au] Autor:Garg RK; Afifi AM; Garland CB; Sanchez R; Mount DL
[Ad] Endereço:Madison, Wis.; and Cairo, Egypt From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Cairo University.
[Ti] Título:Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Consensus, Controversy, and Craniofacial Considerations.
[So] Source:Plast Reconstr Surg;140(5):987-997, 2017 Nov.
[Is] ISSN:1529-4242
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea, characterized by partial or complete obstruction of the upper airway during sleep, is associated with multiple adverse neurodevelopmental and cardiometabolic consequences. It is common in healthy children and occurs with a higher incidence among infants and children with craniofacial anomalies. Although soft-tissue hypertrophy is the most common cause, interplay between soft tissue and bone structure in children with craniofacial differences may also contribute to upper airway obstruction. Snoring and work of breathing are poor predictors of obstructive sleep apnea, and the gold standard for diagnosis is overnight polysomnography. Most healthy children respond favorably to adenotonsillectomy as first-line treatment, but 20 percent of children have obstructive sleep apnea refractory to adenotonsillectomy and may benefit from positive airway pressure, medical therapy, orthodontics, craniofacial surgery, or combined interventions. For children with impairment of facial skeletal growth or craniofacial anomalies, rapid maxillary expansion, midface distraction, and mandibular distraction have all been demonstrated to have therapeutic value and may significantly improve a child's respiratory status. This Special Topic article reviews current theories regarding the underlying pathophysiology of pediatric sleep apnea, summarizes standards for diagnosis and management, and discusses treatments in need of further investigation, including orthodontic and craniofacial interventions. To provide an overview of the spectrum of disease and treatment options available, a deliberately broad approach is taken that incorporates data for both healthy children and children with craniofacial anomalies.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adenoidectomia
Criança
Anormalidades Craniofaciais/complicações
Anormalidades Craniofaciais/cirurgia
Seres Humanos
Ortodontia
Pediatria
Polissonografia
Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico
Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/etiologia
Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/fisiopatologia
Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/cirurgia
Tonsilectomia
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171109
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171109
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171026
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003752


  10 / 6526 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28962741
[Au] Autor:Favero CS; English JD; Cozad BE; Wirthlin JO; Short MM; Kasper FK
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex.
[Ti] Título:Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;152(4):557-565, 2017 Oct.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies enable production of orthodontic models from digital files; yet a range of variables associated with the process could impact the accuracy and clinical utility of the models. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of print layer height on the accuracy of orthodontic models printed 3 dimensionally using a stereolithography format printer and to compare the accuracy of orthodontic models fabricated with several commercially available 3D printers. METHODS: Thirty-six identical models were produced with a stereolithography-based 3D printer using 3 layer heights (n = 12 per group): 25, 50, and 100 µm. Forty-eight additional models were printed using 4 commercially available 3D printers (n = 12 per group). Each printed model was digitally scanned and compared with the input file via superimposition analysis using a best-fit algorithm to assess accuracy. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found in the average overall deviations of models printed at each layer height, with the 25-µm and 100-µm layer height groups having the greatest and least deviations, respectively. Statistically significant differences were also found in the average overall deviations of models produced using the various 3D printer models, but all values fell within clinically acceptable limits. CONCLUSIONS: The print layer height and printer model can affect the accuracy of a 3D printed orthodontic model, but the impact should be considered with respect to the clinical tolerances associated with the envisioned application.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Maxila/anatomia & histologia
Modelos Anatômicos
Ortodontia
Impressão Tridimensional
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171019
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171019
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171001
[St] Status:MEDLINE



página 1 de 653 ir para página                         
   


Refinar a pesquisa
  Base de dados : MEDLINE Formulário avançado   

    Pesquisar no campo  
1  
2
3
 
           



Search engine: iAH v2.6 powered by WWWISIS

BIREME/OPAS/OMS - Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde