Base de dados : MEDLINE
Pesquisa : E06.658.453.637 [Categoria DeCS]
Referências encontradas : 964 [refinar]
Mostrando: 1 .. 10   no formato [Detalhado]

página 1 de 97 ir para página                         

  1 / 964 MEDLINE  
              next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29407502
[Au] Autor:Pelourde C; Bationo R; Boileau MJ; Colat-Parros J; Jordana F
[Ad] Endereço:Pôle d'Odontologie et de Santé buccale, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France; UFR d'Odontologie, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
[Ti] Título:Monomer release from orthodontic retentions: An in vitro study.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;153(2):248-254, 2018 Feb.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: The adhesives used to bond orthodontic retentions are low-loaded composite resins with a resinous matrix containing bisphenol A diglycidyl ether dimethacrylate synthesized from bisphenol A (BPA), fluidizers such as triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and hydrophilic polymers such as hydroxyethylmethacrylate. BPA disrupts the endocrine balance, and TEGDMA has high risks for human health: eg, allergies and cytotoxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the release of monomers from orthodontic bonded retentions. METHODS: A reproducible model of bonded retentions was carried out using calibrated molds. We analyzed the release of monomers by gas phase chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. RESULTS: This model allowed us to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the in-vitro release of monomers from orthodontic adhesives. The quantitative and qualitative analyses showed no BPA release above the 0.02 ppm detection limit. A greater release of TEGDMA was observed with Transbond LR (31.7 µg/mL) than with Transbond XT (13.12 µg/mL) (both, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). Other toxic components (iodobenzene, iodobiphenyl, triphenyl stibine, and so on) were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Toxic and carcinogenic molecules not mentioned in the material safety data sheets were identified.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Contenções Ortodônticas
Peptídeos/análise
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Cimentos Dentários/efeitos adversos
Cimentos Dentários/química
Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas
Seres Humanos
Técnicas In Vitro
Contenções Ortodônticas/efeitos adversos
Peptídeos/efeitos adversos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Nm] Nome de substância:
0 (Dental Cements); 0 (Peptides); 100296-21-7 (biphenomycin A)
[Em] Mês de entrada:1802
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180213
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180213
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180207
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  2 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29407500
[Au] Autor:Gunay F; Oz AA
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
[Ti] Título:Clinical effectiveness of 2 orthodontic retainer wires on mandibular arch retention.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;153(2):232-238, 2018 Feb.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical success of 2 lingual retainer wires. METHODS: The 120 patients included in the study were divided into 2 groups randomly. In group 1, 0.0175-in 6-strand stainless steel wire (Ortho Technology, Lutz, Fla) was used, the lingual retainers were fabricated on plaster models, and a silicon transfer key was used. In group 2, 0.0195-in dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond; Ormco, Orange, Calif) was used, and the lingual retainers were fabricated directly in the patient's mandibular arch without a study model. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and posttreatment 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month 3-dimensional orthodontic models were evaluated. Failure rates, mandibular arch irregularity values, intercanine distances, and arch lengths were compared. RESULTS: The clinical bond failure rates were 13.2% for the 0.0175-in 6-strand stainless steel wire and 18.9% for the 0.0195-in dead-soft wire. The difference in bond failures between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant increase in mandibular arch irregularity in both groups during the 12-month follow-up. However, the increase was significantly higher in the second group than in the first one. Furthermore, the intercanine distance decreased over time in the second group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings regarding mandibular arch measurements indicate that fabrication of lingual retainers can be more safely accomplished with 0.0175-in 6-strand stainless steel wire than with 0.0195-in dead-soft coaxial wire.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Contenções Ortodônticas
Fios Ortodônticos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Arco Dental/patologia
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Má Oclusão/patologia
Má Oclusão/terapia
Mandíbula/patologia
Ortodontia Corretiva/instrumentação
Ortodontia Corretiva/métodos
Aço Inoxidável
Resultado do Tratamento
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:COMPARATIVE STUDY; JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
[Nm] Nome de substância:
12597-68-1 (Stainless Steel)
[Em] Mês de entrada:1802
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180213
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180213
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180207
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  3 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Registro de Ensaios Clínicos
Texto completo
[PMID]:29407494
[Au] Autor:Chhibber A; Agarwal S; Yadav S; Kuo CL; Upadhyay M
[Ad] Endereço:Private practice, Norwalk, Ohio.
[Ti] Título:Which orthodontic appliance is best for oral hygiene? A randomized clinical trial.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;153(2):175-183, 2018 Feb.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Clear aligners and to a lesser extent self-ligated brackets are considered to facilitate better oral hygiene than traditional fixed orthodontic appliances. This 3-arm parallel-group prospective randomized clinical trial compared the long-term and short-term effects of clear aligners, self-ligated brackets, and conventional (elastomeric-ligated) brackets on patients' oral hygiene during active orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Seventy-one participants (41 boys, 30 girls; mean age, 15.6 years) undergoing orthodontic treatment were randomly allocated through a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of the groups based on the choice of intervention: Clear Aligners (CLA) (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) (n = 27), preadjusted edgewise fixed appliance with self-ligated brackets (SLB) (Carriere, Carlsbad, Calif (n = 22), or preadjusted edgewise fixed appliance with elastomeric ligated brackets (ELB) (Ortho Organizers Inc., Carlsbad, CA) (n = 22). For each participant, the primary outcome, plaque index (PI), and secondary outcomes, gingival Index (GI) and periodontal bleeding index (PBI), were measured at baseline (T0), after 9 months of treatment (T1), and after 18 months of treatment (T2). Blinding of the clinicians and the patients to the intervention was impossible. It was only done for outcome assessment and for the statistician. Ten participants did not receive the allocated intervention for various reasons. RESULTS: The means and standard deviations of PI at T0 (CLA, 0.50 ± 0.51; SLB, 0.65 ± 0.49; ELB, 0.70 ± 0.73), T1 (CLA, 0.83 ± 0.48; SLB, 1.38 ± 0.72; ELB, 1.32 ± 0.67), and T2 (CLA, 0.92 ± 0.58; SLB, 1.07 ± 0.59; ELB, 1.32 ± 0.67) were similar. The odds ratio (OR) for plaque index (0 or ≥1) comparing SLB or CLA to ELB was not significant. OR for SLB vs ELB = 1.54 at T0 (95% CI, 0.39-6.27), 0.88 at T1 (95% CI, 0.03-24.69), and 0.83 at T2 (95% CI, 0.02-27.70); OR for CLA vs ELB = 1.07 at T0 (95% CI, 0.30-3.88), 0.24 at T1 (95% CI, 0.01-1.98), and 0.17 at T2 (95% CI, 0.01-1.71). However, the odds ratios comparing CLA with ELB for GI (OR = 0.14; P = 0.015) and PBI (OR = 0.10; P = 0.012) were statistically significant at T1. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, we found no evidence of differences in oral hygiene levels among clear aligners, self-ligated brackets, and conventional elastomeric ligated brackets after 18 months of active orthodontic treatment. REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02745626). PROTOCOL: The protocol was not published before trial commencement.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Higiene Bucal
Aparelhos Ortodônticos
Ortodontia Corretiva/instrumentação
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Índice de Placa Dentária
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Aparelhos Ortodônticos/efeitos adversos
Braquetes Ortodônticos/efeitos adversos
Contenções Ortodônticas/efeitos adversos
Ortodontia Corretiva/efeitos adversos
Índice Periodontal
Fatores de Tempo
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
[Em] Mês de entrada:1802
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180213
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180213
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180207
[Cl] Clinical Trial:ClinicalTrial
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  4 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29269822
[Au] Autor:Madurantakam P; Kumar S
[Ad] Endereço:Department of General Practice, VCU School of Dentistry, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
[Ti] Título:Fixed and removable orthodontic retainers and periodontal health.
[So] Source:Evid Based Dent;18(4):103-104, 2017 12 22.
[Is] ISSN:1476-5446
[Cp] País de publicação:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Data sourcesMedline, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS and BBO databases with no language restrictions; unpublished literature was searched in Proquest Dissertations and Theses database, clinicaltrials.gov and controlled-trials.com.Study selectionRandomised and nonrandomised controlled clinical trials, prospective cohort studies, and case series (with a minimum sample size of 20 patients) in patients who underwent fixed or removable appliance orthodontic therapy with a minimum follow-up period of six months. The primary outcome was periodontal health; while failure rates, impact of orthodontic retainers on patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness served as secondary outcomes.Data extraction and synthesisFull texts of relevant abstracts were retrieved and data extracted using pre-piloted data collection forms by two authors. Study quality was assessed with Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool (RCTs) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomised studies. Only RCTs at low or unclear risk of bias and non-randomised studies of moderate or high methodological quality were included in the meta-analysis (MA). If moderate to high heterogeneity was present (I > 50%), MA was not performed.ResultsOut of the 18 included RCTs, 11 were assessed to be of low risk of bias while five out of six prospective cohort studies were considered high quality using the NOS. The authors did not perform MA because of significant heterogeneity that existed among different studies.With regards to periodontal health, there was no significant difference in probing depth and bleeding on probing between fixed mandibular stainless steel (SS) retainers (bonded to anterior teeth or canines only), fibre reinforced composite retainers or Hawley retainers at three-year follow-up. However, there was increased plaque accumulation around fibre reinforced composite retainers compared to SS retainers. The failure rates of mandibular stainless steel fixed retainers bonded from canine to canine was 0.29 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.26, 0.33) over a follow-up period of six to 36 months. The failure risk for mandibular stainless steel fixed retainers bonded to canines only was 0.25 (CI, 0.16, 0.33) over a follow-up period of one to three years. A meta-regression showed that follow-up period was not a predictor of failure rate for mandibular stainless steel fixed retainers. The failure rates of removable retainers (Hawley's or vacuum formed retainers) are lower than the bonded fixed retainers. Removable Hawley's retainer was associated with increased discomfort as well as higher levels of embarrassment with speech and aesthetics. In terms of cost-effectiveness, vacuum-formed retainers were found to be significantly more cost-effective than Hawley retainers or mandibular stainless steel fixed retainers bonded to canines.ConclusionsThere is a lack of high-quality evidence to endorse the use of one type of orthodontic retainer based on their effect on periodontal health, risk of failure, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Estética Dentária
Contenções Ortodônticas
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Mandíbula
Estudos Prospectivos
Aço Inoxidável
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; COMMENT
[Nm] Nome de substância:
12597-68-1 (Stainless Steel)
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180101
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180101
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171223
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1038/sj.ebd.6401267


  5 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29173862
[Au] Autor:Çifter M; Gümrü Çelikel AD; Çekici A
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: mcifter@yahoo.com.
[Ti] Título:Effects of vacuum-formed retainers on periodontal status and their retention efficiency.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;152(6):830-835, 2017 Dec.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: The stability of treatment results is a major concern in orthodontics. Numerous retention regimens to maintain stability have been introduced. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) on periodontal tissues and the retention efficiency of VFRs. METHODS: Forty patients were included in this study. Clinical effectiveness of VFRs for nighttime use only over a 12-month period was assessed by using the American Board of Orthodontics' Objective Grading System. Periodontal measurements and indexes were recorded and evaluated immediately after removal of the braces and after 1, 6, and 12 months of VFR use. RESULTS: There was no significant change in the total Objective Grading System score between the end of the active treatment period and the end of the 12-month retention period. However, regarding periodontal measurements, the plaque and gingival indexes decreased, whereas the bleeding on probing, probing depth, calculus index, and clinical attachment loss increased between the evaluated periods. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of periodontal health, the use of VFRs resulted in a slight periodontal attachment loss that seemed to be clinically insignificant, without gingival inflammation or recession. In terms of stability, VFRs were found to be effective in orthodontic retention.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Contenções Ortodônticas
Índice Periodontal
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Criança
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico
Estudos Prospectivos
Resultado do Tratamento
Vácuo
Adulto Jovem
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1712
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171211
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171211
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171128
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  6 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29173856
[Au] Autor:Varga S; Spalj S; Anic Milosevic S; Lapter Varga M; Mestrovic S; Trinajstic Zrinski M; Slaj M
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
[Ti] Título:Changes of bite force and occlusal contacts in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A controlled clinical trial.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;152(6):767-777, 2017 Dec.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine whether appliance type affects changes in maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF) and the number of occlusal contacts (NOC) during retention, controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. METHODS: The sample comprised 176 examinees (70 male, 106 female) aged 14 to 20 years: 30 had maxillary and mandibular Essix retainers, 30 had wrap-around retainers, and 30 had a combination of fixed mandibular canine-to-canine retainers bonded on each tooth separately (double twisted, 0.254 mm in diameter, stainless steel ligature wire) and Essix retainer in the maxillary arch; 86 with normal occlusion were not treated. MVBF and the NOC were measured immediately after removal of preadjusted edgewise appliances (Roth prescription), 6 weeks after that, and after the next 4 weeks. RESULTS: Increases in MVBF and the NOC were demonstrated, but subjects with 2 Essix retainers showed lower values than did the others. Changes were related to type of appliance, sex, and age (P <0.05) but not to body mass index. The increase in NOC occurred faster than the increase of MVBF, more and sooner with the wrap-around retainer and in male subjects than with the Essix and in female subjects. MVBF and NOC nearly reached the values of the control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Settling of the occlusion depends on appliance type: it takes longer in female patients and with Essix in both dental arches than with the other tested appliances.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Força de Mordida
Oclusão Dentária
Contenções Ortodônticas
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Estudos Prospectivos
Adulto Jovem
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
[Em] Mês de entrada:1712
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171211
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171211
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171128
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  7 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28962737
[Au] Autor:Al-Moghrabi D; Johal A; Fleming PS
[Ad] Endereço:Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
[Ti] Título:What are people tweeting about orthodontic retention? A cross-sectional content analysis.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;152(4):516-522, 2017 Oct.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Social media can offer valuable insights in relation to the perceptions and impact of medical treatments on patient groups. There is also a lack of information concerning patient experiences with orthodontic retainers and little appreciation of barriers to optimal compliance with orthodontic retention. The aim of this study was to describe the content of Twitter posts related to orthodontic retainers. METHODS: Publicly available tweets were prospectively collected over a period of 3 to 4 weeks using a bespoke social media monitoring tool. A total of 7037 tweets were collected, of which 827 were randomly selected for the analysis. Pilot coding was undertaken on a subset of tweets (n = 70), and a coding guide was developed. Tweets were iteratively categorized under the main themes and subthemes. The frequencies of tweets in each theme and subtheme were subsequently determined. RESULTS: Of 827 tweets, 660 were included in the analysis. The main themes identified included compliance, impact, maintenance, patient-clinician relationship, and positive and negative feelings. Compliance with orthodontic retainers was the most frequently coded theme (n = 248), with most reporting suboptimal compliance. The negative impact of orthodontic retainers on social and daily activities (n = 192) and the maintenance requirements (n = 115) were commonly mentioned. Patients also frequently expressed feelings about their clinician. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective experiences in relation to orthodontic retainers were commonly shared on Twitter. Most of the publicly available tweets portrayed retainer wear in a negative light.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Atitude Frente à Saúde
Contenções Ortodônticas
Mídias Sociais
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Estudos Transversais
Seres Humanos
Estudos Prospectivos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171019
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171019
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171001
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  8 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28760268
[Au] Autor:Goje SK; Bhavasar R
[Ad] Endereço:Gujarat, India.
[Ti] Título:Comparison of survival time and comfort between 2 clear overlay retainers with different thicknesses.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;152(2):143, 2017 08.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Contenções Ortodônticas
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:LETTER; COMMENT
[Em] Mês de entrada:1708
[Cu] Atualização por classe:170810
[Lr] Data última revisão:
170810
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170802
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  9 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:28668945
[Au] Autor:Kravitz ND; Shirck JM
[Ad] Endereço:Journal of Clinical Orthodontics; Private Practice of Orthodontics in South Riding, VA. nealkravitz@gmail.com.
[Ti] Título:Measuring Bonded Lingual Retainers.
[So] Source:J Clin Orthod;51(5):294, 2017 May.
[Is] ISSN:0022-3875
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Colagem Dentária
Contenções Ortodônticas
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1707
[Cu] Atualização por classe:170727
[Lr] Data última revisão:
170727
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170703
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  10 / 964 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:28652507
[Au] Autor:Thomas B; Thomas S
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, People's College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Ayodhya Bypass Road, Bhanpur, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462041, India. boscothomas@yahoo.com.
[Ti] Título:A Modified Retainer for Class II or III Functional and Surgical Patients.
[So] Source:J Clin Orthod;51(4):229-230, 2017 Apr.
[Is] ISSN:0022-3875
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Má Oclusão de Angle Classe III/terapia
Má Oclusão de Angle Classe II/terapia
Desenho de Aparelho Ortodôntico
Contenções Ortodônticas
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1708
[Cu] Atualização por classe:170829
[Lr] Data última revisão:
170829
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170628
[St] Status:MEDLINE



página 1 de 97 ir para página                         
   


Refinar a pesquisa
  Base de dados : MEDLINE Formulário avançado   

    Pesquisar no campo  
1  
2
3
 
           



Search engine: iAH v2.6 powered by WWWISIS

BIREME/OPAS/OMS - Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde