Base de dados : MEDLINE
Pesquisa : E07.305.906.500 [Categoria DeCS]
Referências encontradas : 6995 [refinar]
Mostrando: 1 .. 10   no formato [Detalhado]

página 1 de 700 ir para página                         

  1 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29400045
[Au] Autor:Mobio MNA; Ilé S; Yavo N; Koffi-Aka V; Kouassi-Ndjeundo J; Tea B
[Ti] Título:[Hearing aids at the International Center of Auditory rehabilitation in Abidjan: Prosthetics gains and satisfaction in patients].
[So] Source:Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord);136(5):197-202, 2015.
[Is] ISSN:0035-1334
[Cp] País de publicação:France
[La] Idioma:fre
[Ab] Resumo:Subject: To evaluate patients wearing hearing aid at the International Center of Auditory Correction in Abidjan. Method and material: It is a descriptif and transversal study from 07/01/99 to 06/30/10. We have included the files of patients completely filled. We have stu­died the indications, prosthetics gains and the satisfaction after hearing aid. Results: We have achieved 536 files. The ave­rage was 36 years. The indications have been in 76.1% cases of sensorineural hearing loss. The hearing loss has been associa­ted in 13.2% cases to language disorder. For all patient we have noticed bilateral hearing loss in 496 cases (92.5%). The behind the ear aids have been chosen in 69% cases. The type was analogical or digital respectively in 65% and 35% des cas. The prosthetic pure tonal gain was more than 30 dB in 66.8% cases and the prosthetic speech reception threshold gain more than 30 dB in 55.3% cases. The patients have been respectively satisfied less satisfacted, no satisfacted in 68.47%, 22.76% and 8.7% cases. Conclusion: The hearing aids have improved the audition in most of the indications. The proportion of patients satisfied was proportionally equivalent to the audiometric results.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Auxiliares de Audição
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Adulto
Idoso
Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
Audiometria de Tons Puros
Audiometria da Fala
Criança
Pré-Escolar
Costa do Marfim
Estudos Transversais
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Meia-Idade
Satisfação do Paciente
Adulto Jovem
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1803
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180308
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180308
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180206
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  2 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29262274
[Au] Autor:Cunningham LL; Tucci DL
[Ad] Endereço:From the Section on Sensory Cell Biology, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, MD (L.L.C.); and the Division of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (D.L.T.).
[Ti] Título:Hearing Loss in Adults.
[So] Source:N Engl J Med;377(25):2465-2473, 2017 Dec 21.
[Is] ISSN:1533-4406
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Perda Auditiva
Testes Auditivos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adulto
Implantes Cocleares
Orelha/anatomia & histologia
Predisposição Genética para Doença
Auxiliares de Audição
Perda Auditiva/classificação
Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico
Perda Auditiva/etiologia
Perda Auditiva/terapia
Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180308
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180308
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171221
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1056/NEJMra1616601


  3 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29348197
[Au] Autor:Blustein J; Weinstein BE; Chodosh J
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Health Policy, Robert F Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University. 295 Lafayette Street, New York, NY, USA jan.blustein@wagner.nyu.edu.
[Ti] Título:Tackling hearing loss to improve the care of older adults.
[So] Source:BMJ;360:k21, 2018 01 18.
[Is] ISSN:1756-1833
[Cp] País de publicação:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Perda Auditiva/psicologia
Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia
Relações Profissional-Paciente
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Idoso
Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
Comunicação
Meio Ambiente
Auxiliares de Audição/psicologia
Perda Auditiva/etiologia
Seres Humanos
Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
Percepção da Fala
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1803
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180306
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180306
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180120
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1136/bmj.k21


  4 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:27779562
[Au] Autor:Dumon T; Wegner I; Sperling N; Grolman W
[Ad] Endereço:*Jean Causse Ear Clinic, Colombiers, France †Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery ‡Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands §Department of Clinical Otolaryngology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
[Ti] Título:Implantation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus the Epidermal Flap Technique.
[So] Source:Otol Neurotol;38(1):89-96, 2017 01.
[Is] ISSN:1537-4505
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:OBJECTIVE: To compare the minimal skin punch incision without additional skin incision or soft tissue reduction with the epidermal flap technique and soft tissue reduction, for the implantation of percutaneous bone-anchored hearing devices. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred seventeen patients underwent 220 implantations. Sixty five cases underwent implantation by means of a skin punch resection without soft tissue reduction (punch group) and 155 cases underwent epidermal flap and soft tissue reduction (dermatome group). Main outcome measures were duration of surgery, perioperative adverse events, skin tolerance, and revision surgery. RESULTS: The duration of surgery was shorter in the punch group (p < 0.001). The percentage of normal to moderate skin reactions, by Holgers classification, was higher in the punch group (90%) than in the dermatome group (84%). No severe reactions occurred in the punch group, but did occur in 7% in the dermatome group. These differences, although clinically important, did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.071). The rate of revision surgeries was not significantly different between the two groups. The indication for revision was different: mainly for skin issues in the dermatome group, against implant dislocation in the punch group. CONCLUSION: The implantation of the currently available percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implants with a minimal skin punch resection shortened duration of surgery and improved postoperative appearance, while preserving a good skin tolerance. In the punch group, there were less skin issues leading to revision surgery, however we did observe more implant dislocations needing revision surgery.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Auxiliares de Audição
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otológicos/métodos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adulto
Idoso
Estudos de Coortes
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Meia-Idade
Período Pós-Operatório
Estudos Prospectivos
Reoperação
Retalhos Cirúrgicos
Âncoras de Sutura
Centros de Atenção Terciária
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:CLINICAL TRIAL; JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1709
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180307
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180307
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:161026
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  5 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29496667
[Au] Autor:Simmons PD
[Ad] Endereço:Halesworth, UK.
[Ti] Título:Staff must be trained to speak clearly for those with hearing difficulties.
[So] Source:BMJ;360:k894, 2018 03 01.
[Is] ISSN:1756-1833
[Cp] País de publicação:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Auxiliares de Audição
Perda Auditiva
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:LETTER; COMMENT
[Em] Mês de entrada:1803
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180305
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180305
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180303
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1136/bmj.k894


  6 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
Texto completo
[PMID]:29256573
[Au] Autor:Schilder AG; Chong LY; Ftouh S; Burton MJ
[Ad] Endereço:evidENT, Ear Institute, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, 330 Grays Inn Road, London, UK, WC1X 8DA.
[Ti] Título:Bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids for bilateral hearing impairment in adults.
[So] Source:Cochrane Database Syst Rev;12:CD012665, 2017 12 19.
[Is] ISSN:1469-493X
[Cp] País de publicação:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:BACKGROUND: Acquired hearing loss is common and its incidence increases markedly with age. In most people, 'age-related' hearing loss is sensorineural (due to the loss of cochlear hair cells) and bilateral, affecting both ears to the same degree. Hearing loss categorised as mild, moderate or severe is primarily managed with hearing aids. People with bilateral hearing loss may be offered one aid, fitted to one specific ear, or two aids fitted to both ears. There is uncertainty about the relative benefits to people with hearing loss of these different strategies. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aids in adults with a bilateral hearing impairment. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the ENT Trials Register; Cochrane Register of Studies Online; PubMed; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 8 June 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the fitting of two versus one ear-level acoustic hearing aids in adults (over 18 years) with a bilateral hearing impairment, both ears being eligible for hearing aids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were patient preference for bilateral or unilateral aids, hearing-specific health-related quality of life and adverse effects (pain or discomfort in the ear, initiation or exacerbation of middle or outer ear infection). Secondary outcomes included: usage of hearing aids (as measured by, for example, data logging or battery consumption), generic health-related quality of life, listening ability and audiometric benefit measured as binaural loudness summation. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics. MAIN RESULTS: We included four cross-over RCTs with a total of 209 participants, ranging in age from 23 to 85 and with a preponderance of men. All the studies allowed the use of hearing aids for a total period of at least eight weeks before questions on preference were asked. All studies recruited patients with bilateral hearing loss but there was considerable variation in the types and degree of sensorineural hearing loss that the participants were experiencing.Three of the studies were published before the mid-1990s whereas the fourth study was published in 2011. Therefore, only the most recent study used hearing aids incorporating technology comparable to that currently readily available in high-income settings. Of the four studies, two were conducted in the UK in National Health Service (NHS - public sector) patients: one recruited patients from primary care with hearing loss detected by a screening programme whereas the other recruited patients who had been referred by their primary care practitioner to an otolaryngology department for hearing aids. The other two studies were conducted in the United States: one study recruited only military personnel or veterans with noise-induced hearing loss whereas about half of the participants in the other study were veterans.Only one primary outcome (patient preference) was reported in all studies. The percentage of patients who preferred bilateral hearing aids varied between studies: this was 54% (51 out of 94 participants), 39% (22 out of 56), 55% (16 out of 29) and 77% (23 out of 30), respectively. We have not combined the data from these four studies. The evidence for this outcome is of very low quality.The other outcomes of interest were not reported in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review identified only four studies comparing the use of one hearing aid with two. The studies were small and included participants of widely varying ages. There was also considerable variation in the types and degree of sensorineural hearing loss that the participants were experiencing.For the most part, the types of hearing aid evaluated would now be regarded, in high-income settings, as 'old technology', with only one study looking at 'modern' digital aids. However, the relevance of this is uncertain, as this review did not evaluate the differences in outcomes between the different types of technology.We were unable to pool data from the four studies and the very low quality of the evidence leads us to conclude that we do not know if people with hearing loss have a preference for one aid or two. Similarly, we do not know if hearing-specific health-related quality of life, or any of our other outcomes, are better with bilateral or unilateral aids.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Auxiliares de Audição
Perda Auditiva Bilateral/reabilitação
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adulto
Idoso
Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/instrumentação
Correção de Deficiência Auditiva/métodos
Estudos Cross-Over
Feminino
Auxiliares de Audição/utilização
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Meia-Idade
Preferência do Paciente
Qualidade de Vida
Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
Localização de Som
Inteligibilidade da Fala
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; META-ANALYSIS; RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180129
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180129
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171220
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012665.pub2


  7 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:27779518
[Au] Autor:Stam M; Smit JH; Twisk JW; Lemke U; Smits C; Festen JM; Kramer SE
[Ad] Endereço:1Section Ear & Hearing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center/GGZ inGeest and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and 4Phonak AG, Science and Technology, Stäfa, Switzerland.
[Ti] Título:Change in Psychosocial Health Status Over 5 Years in Relation to Adults' Hearing Ability in Noise.
[So] Source:Ear Hear;37(6):680-689, 2016 Nov/Dec.
[Is] ISSN:1538-4667
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to establish the longitudinal relationship between hearing ability in noise and psychosocial health outcomes (i.e., loneliness, anxiety, depression, distress, and somatization) in adults aged 18 to 70 years. An additional objective was to determine whether a change in hearing ability in noise over a period of 5 years was associated with a change in psychosocial functioning. Subgroup effects for a range of factors were investigated. DESIGN: Longitudinal data of the web-based Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing (NL-SH) (N = 508) were analyzed. The ability to recognize speech in noise (i.e., the speech-reception-threshold [SRTn]) was measured with an online digit triplet test at baseline and at 5-year follow-up. Psychosocial health status was assessed by online questionnaires. Multiple linear regression analyses and longitudinal statistical analyses (i.e., generalized estimating equations) were performed. RESULTS: Poorer SRTn was associated longitudinally with more feelings of emotional and social loneliness. For participants with a high educational level, the longitudinal association between SRTn and social loneliness was significant. Changes in hearing ability and loneliness appeared significantly associated only for specific subgroups: those with stable pattern of hearing aid nonuse (increased emotional and social loneliness), who entered matrimony (increased social loneliness), and low educational level (less emotional loneliness). No significant longitudinal associations were found between hearing ability and anxiety, depression, distress, or somatization. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing ability in noise was longitudinally associated with loneliness. Decline in hearing ability in noise was related to increase in loneliness for specific subgroups of participants. One of these subgroups included participants whose hearing deteriorated over 5 years, but who continued to report nonuse of hearing aids. This is an important and alarming finding that needs further investigation.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Ansiedade/psicologia
Depressão/psicologia
Nível de Saúde
Perda Auditiva/psicologia
Audição
Solidão/psicologia
Transtornos Somatoformes/psicologia
Estresse Psicológico/psicologia
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Adulto
Idoso
Escolaridade
Feminino
Auxiliares de Audição
Perda Auditiva/fisiopatologia
Perda Auditiva/reabilitação
Seres Humanos
Estudos Longitudinais
Masculino
Saúde Mental
Meia-Idade
Ruído
Percepção da Fala
Teste do Limiar de Recepção da Fala
Adulto Jovem
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180117
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180117
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:161026
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  8 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:27779517
[Au] Autor:O'Gara SJ; Cullington HE; Grasmeder ML; Adamou M; Matthews ES
[Ad] Endereço:1University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, Southampton, United Kingdom; and 2Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, Southampton, United Kingdom.
[Ti] Título:Factors Affecting Speech Perception Improvement Post Implantation in Congenitally Deaf Adults.
[So] Source:Ear Hear;37(6):671-679, 2016 Nov/Dec.
[Is] ISSN:1538-4667
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:OBJECTIVES: To identify factors preimplantation associated with postimplantation speech perception improvement in the adult congenitally deaf population. DESIGN: Forty-four adult cochlear implant (CI) patients who had a severe to profound hearing loss from birth were identified from this centre's database. Eight preimplantation factors, speech intelligibility, preimplantation hearing levels, communication mode, preimplantation speech perception scores, progression of hearing loss, age at implantation, hearing aid use preimplantation, and gender, were recorded during the CI assessment process. These factors were investigated to determine their effect on speech perception improvement postimplantation. The outcome measures were the improvement in scores for the BKB Sentence test and CUNY Sentence test with lipreading after implantation. In the final analysis, 26 patients were included in the CUNY analysis, and 30 patients were included in the BKB analysis. RESULTS: Speech intelligibility rating, preimplantation hearing levels, and communication mode were shown to be significantly associated with improvements in speech perception postimplantation. CONCLUSION: Three factors were identified that affected speech perception improvement postimplantation: speech intelligibility, preimplantation hearing levels, and communication mode. These factors can be used to counsel CI patients regarding potential speech perception improvements from cochlear implantation, although these are based on average data and may not reflect individual performance.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Implante Coclear
Surdez/reabilitação
Auxiliares de Audição
Leitura Labial
Inteligibilidade da Fala
Percepção da Fala
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Adulto
Fatores Etários
Implantes Cocleares
Surdez/congênito
Progressão da Doença
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Meia-Idade
Prognóstico
Índice de Gravidade de Doença
Resultado do Tratamento
Adulto Jovem
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180117
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180117
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:161026
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  9 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28964299
[Au] Autor:Marques LHS; Martins DV; Juares GL; Lorenzetti FTM; Monsanto RDC
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Banco de Olhos de Sorocaba Hospital, Sorocaba, Brazil.
[Ti] Título:Otologic manifestations of Larsen syndrome.
[So] Source:Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol;101:223-229, 2017 Oct.
[Is] ISSN:1872-8464
[Cp] País de publicação:Ireland
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:OBJECTIVE: To describe and discuss otologic manifestations of Larsen syndrome, based on a case report and a systematic review of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a PubMED database search, and we selected studies reporting otolaryngologic manifestations secondary to Larsen syndrome. The selected articles were read in full, and three researchers independently extracted data from the studies. In parallel, we report the case of a 14-year-old patient who had hearing loss secondary to Larsen syndrome. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met our selection criteria. Seven studies reported hearing loss in patients with Larsen syndrome (4 had conductive hearing loss and 3 had mixed hearing loss). The conductive hearing loss may be secondary to ossicular malformations and/or middle ear effusions. Other causes for conductive hearing loss are mesenchymal remnants in the middle ear, Eustachian tube dysfunction, and cleft palate. Surgical management of the hearing loss is possible in selected cases, although the surgical and anesthetic risks should be considered. Hearing aids seem to be safe and effective treatment options for the hearing loss secondary to Larsen syndrome. CONCLUSION: Although rare, patients with Larsen syndrome may have hearing loss. The most frequent type of deficit is conductive, either secondary to malformation of the ossicles or middle ear effusion. Possible surgical correction of these abnormalities should be weighed against the anesthetic risks of these patients.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Perda Auditiva/etiologia
Osteocondrodisplasias/complicações
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Pré-Escolar
Orelha Média/anormalidades
Auxiliares de Audição/efeitos adversos
Perda Auditiva/terapia
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:CASE REPORTS; JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171016
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171016
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171002
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  10 / 6995 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28964294
[Au] Autor:Bezdjian A; Bruijnzeel H; Daniel SJ; Grolman W; Thomeer HGXM
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; McGill Auditory Sciences Lab, McGill University Health Centre Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Neth
[Ti] Título:Preliminary audiologic and peri-operative outcomes of the Sophono™ transcutaneous bone conduction device: A systematic review.
[So] Source:Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol;101:196-203, 2017 Oct.
[Is] ISSN:1872-8464
[Cp] País de publicação:Ireland
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:OBJECTIVE: To delineate the auditory functional improvement and peri-operative outcomes of the Sophono™ transcutaneous bone conduction device. METHODS: Eligible articles presenting patients implanted with the Sophono™ were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase electronic databases. All relevant articles were reviewed to justify inclusion independently by 2 authors. Studies that successfully passed critical appraisal for directness of evidence and risk of bias were included. RESULTS: From a total of 125 articles, 8 studies encompassing 86 patients using 99 implants were selected. Most patients (79.1%) were children. Ear atresia (67.5%) was the most frequently reported indication for Sophono™ implantation. Overall pure tone average auditory improvement was 31.10 (±8.29) decibel. During a mean follow-up time of 12.48 months, 25 patients (29%) presented with post-operative complications from which 3 were deemed as serious implant-related adverse events (3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The Sophono™ transcutaneous bone conduction device shows promising functional improvement, no intra-operative complications and minor post-operative skin related complications. If suitable, the device could be a proposed solution for the rehabilitation of hearing in children meeting eligibility criteria. A wearing schedule must be implemented in order to reduce magnet-related skin complications.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Condução Óssea/fisiologia
Auxiliares de Audição
Perda Auditiva Condutiva/cirurgia
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Audiologia
Criança
Feminino
Audição
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Complicações Pós-Operatórias
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171016
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171016
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171002
[St] Status:MEDLINE



página 1 de 700 ir para página                         
   


Refinar a pesquisa
  Base de dados : MEDLINE Formulário avançado   

    Pesquisar no campo  
1  
2
3
 
           



Search engine: iAH v2.6 powered by WWWISIS

BIREME/OPAS/OMS - Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde