Base de dados : MEDLINE
Pesquisa : F01.829.316.549 [Categoria DeCS]
Referências encontradas : 6792 [refinar]
Mostrando: 1 .. 10   no formato [Detalhado]

página 1 de 680 ir para página                         

  1 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:27776359
[Au] Autor:Gray S
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe.
[Ti] Título:Exciting Changes Coming to LSHSS! You Are Invited to Participate!
[So] Source:Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch;47(4):259, 2016 10 01.
[Is] ISSN:1558-9129
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Purpose: In this editorial, the Editor of Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools (LSHSS) describes important changes coming to LSHSS and all ASHA journals and calls for readers to voice their opinion regarding important topics and formats they would like to see included in future LSHSS volumes.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/tendências
Patologia da Fala e Linguagem/tendências
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Políticas Editoriais
Seres Humanos
Revisão por Pares
Editoração/tendências
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1708
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180214
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180214
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:161027
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1044/2016_LSHSS-16-0025


  2 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29249091
[Au] Autor:Barnard A; Harvey T; Theobald K; Tippett V; Rider T
[Ti] Título:SUPPORTING CLINICAL FACILITATORS THROUGH PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING.
[So] Source:Aust Nurs Midwifery J;24(4):34-5, 2016 10.
[Is] ISSN:2202-7114
[Cp] País de publicação:Australia
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:The QUT School of Nursing is currently trialling peer review of teaching (PRoT) as one strategy to support clinical facilitators working with undergraduate students. Work integrated learning (WIL) relies on collaborative partnerships and clinical facilitators need specific skills and knowledge.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Bacharelado em Enfermagem/normas
Docentes de Enfermagem
Revisão por Pares
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Austrália
Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180118
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180118
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:N
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171218
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  3 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29244465
[Au] Autor:Delaney L
[Ti] Título:PEER REVIEWED BASED ASSESSMENT IN POST GRADUATE EDUCATION.
[So] Source:Aust Nurs Midwifery J;24(3):37, 2016 09.
[Is] ISSN:2202-7114
[Cp] País de publicação:Australia
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Students have a propensity to focus their learning aligned to the assessment items established within the units of study, rather than acknowledging the broader need to learn and apply the content taught. This approach to education stifles students' learning and their ability to apply knowledge, and as a result, essential content can be poorly retained.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Enfermagem de Cuidados Críticos/educação
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem
Revisão por Pares
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Austrália
Currículo
Avaliação Educacional
Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180118
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180118
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:N
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171216
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  4 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29179421
[Au] Autor:Agoramoorthy G
[Ad] Endereço:College of Pharmacy and Health Care, Tajen University, Yanpu, Pingtung, Taiwan and S-VYASA University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Electronic address: agoram@tajen.edu.tw.
[Ti] Título:Enhancing Ethics in Peer Review Process.
[So] Source:World Neurosurg;108:975-976, 2017 12.
[Is] ISSN:1878-8769
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares
Revisão por Pares/ética
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:LETTER; COMMENT
[Em] Mês de entrada:1712
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171214
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171214
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171129
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  5 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28829869
[Au] Autor:Bauchner H; Fontanarosa P
[Ad] Endereço:Editor in Chief, , Chicago, Illinois.
[Ti] Título:Bias Among Peer Reviewers.
[So] Source:JAMA;318(8):755-756, 2017 08 22.
[Is] ISSN:1538-3598
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Viés
Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Revisão por Pares
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:LETTER; COMMENT
[Em] Mês de entrada:1709
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171116
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171116
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170823
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.9201


  6 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28829866
[Au] Autor:Adler AC; Stayer SA
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston.
[Ti] Título:Bias Among Peer Reviewers.
[So] Source:JAMA;318(8):755, 2017 08 22.
[Is] ISSN:1538-3598
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Viés
Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Revisão por Pares
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:LETTER; COMMENT
[Em] Mês de entrada:1709
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171116
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171116
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170823
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.9186


  7 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28754200
[Au] Autor:Bruening M; Argo K; Payne-Sturges D; Laska MN
[Ti] Título:The Struggle Is Real: A Systematic Review of Food Insecurity on Postsecondary Education Campuses.
[So] Source:J Acad Nutr Diet;117(11):1767-1791, 2017 Nov.
[Is] ISSN:2212-2672
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:BACKGROUND: Numerous international studies have examined cross-sectional correlates of food insecurity (FI) among postsecondary education students. Research is needed to synthesize the findings of this work to support vulnerable students. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review peer-reviewed and gray literature to assess the prevalence of FI on postsecondary education institutions, as well as factors related to FI among students and suggested/practiced solutions. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. Medline, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases were searched for peer-reviewed literature for FI research; a Google search (Google Inc) was conducted to obtain gray literature on FI among postsecondary education students. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Undergraduate and graduate students at postsecondary institutions of higher education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included prevalence of FI; sociodemographic, health, and academic factors related to FI; and solutions to address FI on postsecondary institutions. RESULTS: Seventeen peer-reviewed studies and 41 sources of gray literature were identified (out of 11,476 titles). All studies were cross-sectional. Rates of FI were high among students, with average rates across the gray and peer-reviewed literature of 35% and 42%, respectively. FI was consistently associated with financial independence, poor health, and adverse academic outcomes. Suggested solutions to address food security among postsecondary institutions addressed all areas of the socioecologic model, but the solutions most practiced included those in the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and institutional levels. CONCLUSIONS: FI is a major public health problem among postsecondary education students. Studies are needed to assess the long-term influence of FI among this vulnerable population. More research is needed on the effectiveness of FI interventions.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Abastecimento de Alimentos/estatística & dados numéricos
Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adolescente
Adulto
Estudos Transversais
Feminino
Nível de Saúde
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Revisão por Pares
Fatores de Risco
Fatores Socioeconômicos
Adulto Jovem
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171102
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171102
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170730
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  8 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28700651
[Au] Autor:Koya K; Chowdhury G
[Ad] Endereço:iSchool @ Department of Computers and Information Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Pandon Building, Camden Street, Northumbria University, Newcastle City Campus, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
[Ti] Título:Metric-based vs peer-reviewed evaluation of a research output: Lesson learnt from UK's national research assessment exercise.
[So] Source:PLoS One;12(7):e0179722, 2017.
[Is] ISSN:1932-6203
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:PURPOSE: There is a general inquisition regarding the monetary value of a research output, as a substantial amount of funding in modern academia is essentially awarded to good research presented in the form of journal articles, conferences papers, performances, compositions, exhibitions, books and book chapters etc., which, eventually leads to another question if the value varies across different disciplines. Answers to these questions will not only assist academics and researchers, but will also help higher education institutions (HEIs) make informed decisions in their administrative and research policies. DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY: To examine both the questions, we applied the United Kingdom's recently concluded national research assessment exercise known as the Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2014 as a case study. All the data for this study is sourced from the openly available publications which arose from the digital repositories of REF's results and HEFCE's funding allocations. FINDINGS: A world leading output earns between £7504 and £14,639 per year within the REF cycle, whereas an internationally excellent output earns between £1876 and £3659, varying according to their area of research. Secondly, an investigation into the impact rating of 25315 journal articles submitted in five areas of research by UK HEIs and their awarded funding revealed a linear relationship between the percentage of quartile-one journal publications and percentage of 4* outputs in Clinical Medicine, Physics and Psychology/Psychiatry/Neuroscience UoAs, and no relationship was found in the Classics and Anthropology/Development Studies UoAs, due to the fact that most publications in the latter two disciplines are not journal articles. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings provide an indication of the monetary value of a research output, from the perspectives of government funding for research, and also what makes a good output, i.e. whether a relationship exists between good quality output and the source of its publication. The findings may also influence future REF submission strategies in HEIs and ascertain that the impact rating of the journals is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of research in every discipline, and this may have a significant influence on the future of scholarly communications in general. ORIGINALITY: According to the author's knowledge, this is the first time an investigation has estimated the monetary value of a good research output.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Pesquisa Biomédica
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Revisão por Pares
Editoração
Reino Unido
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1709
[Cu] Atualização por classe:170925
[Lr] Data última revisão:
170925
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170713
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0179722


  9 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28684631
[Au] Autor:Liaw L; Freedman JE; Becker LB; Mehta NN; Liscum L; Peer Review Subcommittee of the American Heart Association National Research Committee; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; Council on Hypertension; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Stroke Council
[Ti] Título:Peer Review Practices for Evaluating Biomedical Research Grants: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
[So] Source:Circ Res;121(4):e9-e19, 2017 Aug 04.
[Is] ISSN:1524-4571
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:The biomedical research enterprise depends on the fair and objective peer review of research grants, leading to the distribution of resources through efficient and robust competitive methods. In the United States, federal funding agencies and foundations collectively distribute billions of dollars annually to support biomedical research. For the American Heart Association, a Peer Review Subcommittee is charged with establishing the highest standards for peer review. This scientific statement reviews the current literature on peer review practices, describes the current American Heart Association peer review process and those of other agencies, analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of American Heart Association peer review practices, and recommends best practices for the future.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: American Heart Association
Pesquisa Biomédica/normas
Revisão por Pares/normas
Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/normas
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Pesquisa Biomédica/economia
Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos
Seres Humanos
Revisão por Pares/métodos
Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia
Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/métodos
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1709
[Cu] Atualização por classe:170911
[Lr] Data última revisão:
170911
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170708
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1161/RES.0000000000000158


  10 / 6792 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28679568
[Au] Autor:Curran-Everett D
[Ad] Endereço:Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado; and Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado EverettD@NJHealth.org.
[Ti] Título:The thrill of the paper, the agony of the review.
[So] Source:Adv Physiol Educ;41(3):338-340, 2017 Sep 01.
[Is] ISSN:1522-1229
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:The process of first writing a scientific paper and then responding to reviewer comments can be challenging and sometimes-some might say often-frustrating. In this personal view, I recount some of my experiences as an author, and I offer some strategies to write a paper and to then respond to comments from the people who reviewed it.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Revisão por Pares
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto
Ciência/métodos
Redação
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Comunicação
Seres Humanos
Editoração
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:EDITORIAL
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171106
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171106
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170707
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1152/advan.00069.2017



página 1 de 680 ir para página                         
   


Refinar a pesquisa
  Base de dados : MEDLINE Formulário avançado   

    Pesquisar no campo  
1  
2
3
 
           



Search engine: iAH v2.6 powered by WWWISIS

BIREME/OPAS/OMS - Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde