Base de dados : MEDLINE
Pesquisa : H02.010.625 [Categoria DeCS]
Referências encontradas : 2540 [refinar]
Mostrando: 1 .. 10   no formato [Detalhado]

página 1 de 254 ir para página                         

  1 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29292562
[Au] Autor:Elsner B
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Public Health, Dresden Medical School, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
[Ti] Título:Systematic reviews for informing clinical practice.
[So] Source:Physiother Res Int;23(1), 2018 01.
[Is] ISSN:1471-2865
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Pesquisa de Reabilitação/tendências
Literatura de Revisão como Assunto
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Metanálise como Assunto
Fisioterapia
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:EDITORIAL
[Em] Mês de entrada:1803
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180308
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180308
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180103
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1002/pri.1703


  2 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
[PMID]:29203754
[Au] Autor:Pietras P; Lyp M; Nowicka K; Soliwoda M; Kruszynski M; Malczewski D
[Ad] Endereço:Klinika Kardiologii Oddzialu Fizjoterapii, Ii Wydzial Lekarski, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Warszawa, Polska, Wyzsza Szkola Rehabilitacji W Warszawie, Warszawa, Polska.
[Ti] Título:[Scientific research results commercialization as an opportunity for the physiotherapy development].
[So] Source:Wiad Lek;70(5):988-991, 2017.
[Is] ISSN:0043-5147
[Cp] País de publicação:Poland
[La] Idioma:pol
[Ab] Resumo:Physiotherapy is under the very intensive development. The research carried out around the world result in implementing new forms of therapy. For several years higher education institutions are trying to support scientists in an attempt to commercialize the results of research, although the process is complex. The practice in the world shows that the cooperation of science and business is possible and results in the implementation of modern solutions as real applications. It is important to scientists and people planning a career in science knew the rules and limitations of the above process.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração
Medicina Baseada em Evidências
Fisioterapia/organização & administração
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1803
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180308
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180308
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171206
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  3 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29173721
[Au] Autor:Liu XL; Zahrt DM; Simms MD
[Ad] Endereço:Bethel Hearing-Speaking Training Center, 7801 South Stemmons Freeway, Corinth, TX 76210, USA.
[Ti] Título:An Interprofessional Team Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Children with Language Disorders.
[So] Source:Pediatr Clin North Am;65(1):73-90, 2018 Feb.
[Is] ISSN:1557-8240
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:The ability to communicate effectively with others is central to children's development. Delays or disruptions due to isolated expressive language delay, articulation errors, multiple sound production errors with motor planning deficits, or mixed expressive and receptive language delay, often bring widespread consequences. Physical anomalies, neurologic and genetic disorder, cognitive and intellectual disabilities, and emotional disturbances may affect speech and language development. Communication disorders may be misdiagnosed as intellectual impairment or autism. Interdisciplinary evaluation should include speech and language assessment, physical and neurologic status, cognitive and emotional profile, and family and social history. This article describes assessment and reviews common pediatric communication disorders.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Relações Interprofissionais
Transtornos da Linguagem/diagnóstico
Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente
Pediatria
Psicologia da Criança
Patologia da Fala e Linguagem
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Audiologia
Criança
Pré-Escolar
Diagnóstico Diferencial
Seres Humanos
Transtornos da Linguagem/etiologia
Transtornos da Linguagem/psicologia
Testes de Linguagem
Terapia Ocupacional
Fisioterapia
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171129
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171129
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171128
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  4 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29173712
[Au] Autor:McNeilly LG
[Ad] Endereço:Speech-Language Pathology, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2200 Research Boulevard, #229, Rockville, MD 20850-3289, USA. Electronic address: Lmcneilly@asha.org.
[Ti] Título:Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework to Achieve Interprofessional Functional Outcomes for Young Children: A Speech-Language Pathology Perspective.
[So] Source:Pediatr Clin North Am;65(1):125-134, 2018 Feb.
[Is] ISSN:1557-8240
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework is an excellent tool to facilitate the writing of functional goals for children who exhibit communication disorders and other developmental problems that require services from professionals in multiple therapeutic areas. The holistic view of children provides each professional with an approach that integrates how one's specific health conditions and contextual factors influence a child's functioning and participation in daily activities. This allows the interprofessional team to view the child as a person, recognizing how one need influences another within his or her environment.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Transtornos da Comunicação/diagnóstico
Transtornos da Comunicação/terapia
Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde
Relações Interprofissionais
Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente
Patologia da Fala e Linguagem
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Criança
Pré-Escolar
Transtornos da Comunicação/classificação
Metas
Seres Humanos
Avaliação de Resultados (Cuidados de Saúde)/métodos
Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente
Pediatria
Fisioterapia
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; REVIEW
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171129
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171129
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171128
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  5 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29088237
[Au] Autor:Haines TP; Bowles KA; Mitchell D; O'Brien L; Markham D; Plumb S; May K; Philip K; Haas R; Sarkies MN; Ghaly M; Shackell M; Chiu T; McPhail S; McDermott F; Skinner EH
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
[Ti] Título:Impact of disinvestment from weekend allied health services across acute medical and surgical wards: 2 stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials.
[So] Source:PLoS Med;14(10):e1002412, 2017 Oct.
[Is] ISSN:1549-1676
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:BACKGROUND: Disinvestment (removal, reduction, or reallocation) of routinely provided health services can be difficult when there is little published evidence examining whether the services are effective or not. Evidence is required to understand if removing these services produces outcomes that are inferior to keeping such services in place. However, organisational imperatives, such as budget cuts, may force healthcare providers to disinvest from these services before the required evidence becomes available. There are presently no experimental studies examining the effectiveness of allied health services (e.g., physical therapy, occupational therapy, and social work) provided on weekends across acute medical and surgical hospital wards, despite these services being routinely provided internationally. The aim of this study was to understand the impact of removing weekend allied health services from acute medical and surgical wards using a disinvestment-specific non-inferiority research design. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted 2 stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials between 1 February 2014 and 30 April 2015 among patients on 12 acute medical or surgical hospital wards spread across 2 hospitals. The hospitals involved were 2 metropolitan teaching hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Data from n = 14,834 patients were collected for inclusion in Trial 1, and n = 12,674 in Trial 2. Trial 1 was a disinvestment-specific non-inferiority stepped-wedge trial where the 'current' weekend allied health service was incrementally removed from participating wards each calendar month, in a random order, while Trial 2 used a conventional non-inferiority stepped-wedge design, where a 'newly developed' service was incrementally reinstated on the same wards as in Trial 1. Primary outcome measures were patient length of stay (proportion staying longer than expected and mean length of stay), the proportion of patients experiencing any adverse event, and the proportion with an unplanned readmission within 28 days of discharge. The 'no weekend allied health service' condition was considered to be not inferior if the 95% CIs of the differences between this condition and the condition with weekend allied health service delivery were below a 2% increase in the proportion of patients who stayed in hospital longer than expected, a 2% increase in the proportion who had an unplanned readmission within 28 days, a 2% increase in the proportion who had any adverse event, and a 1-day increase in the mean length of stay. The current weekend allied health service included physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, dietetics, social work, and allied health assistant services in line with usual care at the participating sites. The newly developed weekend allied health service allowed managers at each site to reprioritise tasks being performed and the balance of hours provided by each professional group and on which days they were provided. Analyses conducted on an intention-to-treat basis demonstrated that there was no estimated effect size difference between groups in the proportion of patients staying longer than expected (weekend versus no weekend; estimated effect size difference [95% CI], p-value) in Trial 1 (0.40 versus 0.38; estimated effect size difference 0.01 [-0.01 to 0.04], p = 0.31, CI was both above and below non-inferiority margin), but the proportion staying longer than expected was greater with the newly developed service compared to its no weekend service control condition (0.39 versus 0.40; estimated effect size difference 0.02 [0.01 to 0.04], p = 0.04, CI was completely below non-inferiority margin) in Trial 2. Trial 1 and 2 findings were discordant for the mean length of stay outcome (Trial 1: 5.5 versus 6.3 days; estimated effect size difference 1.3 days [0.9 to 1.8], p < 0.001, CI was both above and below non-inferiority margin; Trial 2: 5.9 versus 5.0 days; estimated effect size difference -1.6 days [-2.0 to -1.1], p < 0.001, CI was completely below non-inferiority margin). There was no difference between conditions for the proportion who had an unplanned readmission within 28 days in either trial (Trial 1: 0.01 [-0.01 to 0.03], p = 0.18, CI was both above and below non-inferiority margin; Trial 2: -0.01 [-0.02 to 0.01], p = 0.62, CI completely below non-inferiority margin). There was no difference between conditions in the proportion of patients who experienced any adverse event in Trial 1 (0.01 [-0.01 to 0.03], p = 0.33, CI was both above and below non-inferiority margin), but a lower proportion of patients had an adverse event in Trial 2 when exposed to the no weekend allied health condition (-0.03 [-0.05 to -0.004], p = 0.02, CI completely below non-inferiority margin). Limitations of this research were that 1 of the trial wards was closed by the healthcare provider after Trial 1 and could not be included in Trial 2, and that both withdrawing the current weekend allied health service model and installing a new one may have led to an accommodation period for staff to adapt to the new service settings. Stepped-wedge trials are potentially susceptible to bias from naturally occurring change over time at the service level; however, this was adjusted for in our analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In Trial 1, criteria to say that the no weekend allied health condition was non-inferior to current weekend allied health condition were not met, while neither the no weekend nor current weekend allied health condition demonstrated superiority. In Trial 2, the no weekend allied health condition was non-inferior to the newly developed weekend allied health condition across all primary outcomes, and superior for the outcomes proportion of patients staying longer than expected, proportion experiencing any adverse event, and mean length of stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001231730 and ACTRN12613001361796.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Plantão Médico/organização & administração
Dietética/organização & administração
Serviços de Saúde
Unidades Hospitalares
Terapia Ocupacional/organização & administração
Fisioterapia/organização & administração
Serviço Social/organização & administração
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Plantão Médico/economia
Pessoal Técnico de Saúde
Austrália
Dietética/economia
Hospitalização
Seres Humanos
Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos
Modelos Lineares
Análise Multinível
Terapia Ocupacional/economia
Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos
Fisioterapia/economia
Serviço Social/economia
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171110
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171110
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171101
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002412


  6 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29077909
[Au] Autor:Boissonnault JS; Cambier Z; Hetzel SJ; Plack MM
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Physical Therapy and Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, 2000 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Ste 227, Washington, DC 20006, and Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
[Ti] Título:Prevalence and Risk of Inappropriate Sexual Behavior of Patients Toward Physical Therapist Clinicians and Students in the United States.
[So] Source:Phys Ther;97(11):1084-1093, 2017 Nov 01.
[Is] ISSN:1538-6724
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Background: For health care providers in the United States, the risk for nonfatal violence in the workplace is 16 times greater than that for other workers. Inappropriate patient sexual behavior (IPSB) is directed at clinicians, staff, or other patients and may include leering, sexual remarks, deliberate touching, indecent exposure, and sexual assault. Inappropriate patient sexual behavior may adversely affect clinicians, the organization, or patients themselves. Few IPSB risk factors for physical therapists have been confirmed. The US prevalence was last assessed in the 1990s. Objective: The objectives of this study were to determine career and 12-month exposure to IPSB among US physical therapists, physical therapist assistants, physical therapist students, and physical therapist assistant students and to identify IPSB risk factors. Design: This was a retrospective and observational study. Methods: An electronic survey was developed; content validity and test-retest reliability were established. Participants were recruited through physical therapist and physical therapist assistant academic programs and sections of the American Physical Therapy Association. Inappropriate patient sexual behavior risk models were constructed individually for any, mild, moderate, and severe IPSB events reported over the past 12 months. Open-ended comments were analyzed using qualitative methods. Results: Eight hundred ninety-two physical therapist professionals and students completed the survey. The career prevalence among respondents was 84%, and the 12-month prevalence was 47%. Statistical risk modeling for any IPSB over the past 12 months indicated the following risks: having fewer years of direct patient care, routinely working with patients with cognitive impairments, being a female practitioner, and treating male patients. Qualitative analysis of 187 open-ended comments revealed patient-related characteristics, provider-related characteristics, and abusive actions. Limitations: Self-report, clinician memory, and convenience sampling are limitations of this type of survey research. Conclusions: The extremely high prevalence of IPSB among physical therapist professionals warrants practitioner and student education as well as clear workplace policy and support.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Fisioterapia
Delitos Sexuais/estatística & dados numéricos
Comportamento Sexual/estatística & dados numéricos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adulto
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Masculino
Meia-Idade
Relações Médico-Paciente
Prevalência
Estudos Retrospectivos
Risco
Fatores de Risco
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171113
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171113
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171028
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzx086


  7 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29029551
[Au] Autor:Laliberté M; Mazer B; Orozco T; Chilingaryan G; Williams-Jones B; Hunt M; Feldman DE
[Ad] Endereço:École de Réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 Succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7; and Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain (CRIR), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
[Ti] Título:Low Back Pain: Investigation of Biases in Outpatient Canadian Physical Therapy.
[So] Source:Phys Ther;97(10):985-997, 2017 Oct 01.
[Is] ISSN:1538-6724
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Background: Previous research suggested that physical therapy services can be influenced by patient characteristics (age, sex, socioeconomic status) or insurance status rather than their clinical need. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether patient-related factors (age, sex, SES) and the source of reimbursement for physical therapy services (insurance status) influence wait time for, frequency of, and duration of physical therapy for low back pain. Design: This study was an empirical cross-sectional online survey of Canadian physical therapy professionals (defined as including physical therapists and physical rehabilitation specialists). Methods: A total of 846 physical therapy professionals received 1 of 24 different (and randomly selected) clinical vignettes (ie, patient case scenarios) and completed a 40-item questionnaire about how they would treat the fictional patient in the vignette as well as their professional clinical practice. Each vignette described a patient with low back pain but with variations in patient characteristics (age, sex, socioeconomic status) and insurance status (no insurance, private insurance, Workers' Compensation Board insurance). Results: The age, sex, and socioeconomic status of the fictional vignette patients did not affect how participants would provide service. However, vignette patients with Workers' Compensation Board insurance would be seen more frequently than those with private insurance or no insurance. When asked explicitly, study participants stated that insurance status, age, and chronicity of the condition were not factors associated with wait time for, frequency of, or duration of treatment. Limitations: This study used a standardized vignette patient and may not accurately represent physical therapy professionals' actual clinical practice. Conclusions: There appears to be an implicit professional bias in relation to patients' insurance status; the resulting inequity in service provision highlights the need for further research as a basis for national guidelines to promote equity in access to and provision of quality physical therapy services.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde
Cobertura do Seguro
Dor Lombar/terapia
Seleção de Pacientes
Fisioterapia
Indenização aos Trabalhadores
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adulto
Fatores Etários
Idoso
Canadá
Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado
Estudos Transversais
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Seleção Tendenciosa de Seguro
Masculino
Meia-Idade
Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos
Fisioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos
Mecanismo de Reembolso
Viés de Seleção
Fatores Sexuais
Classe Social
Inquéritos e Questionários
Tempo para o Tratamento
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171017
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171017
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171015
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzx055


  8 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28586468
[Au] Autor:Jensen GM; Hack LM; Nordstrom T; Gwyer J; Mostrom E
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Physical Therapy, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178 (USA).
[Ti] Título:National Study of Excellence and Innovation in Physical Therapist Education: Part 2-A Call to Reform.
[So] Source:Phys Ther;97(9):875-888, 2017 Sep 01.
[Is] ISSN:1538-6724
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:This perspective shares recommendations that draw from (1) the National Study of Excellence and Innovation in Physical Therapist Education research findings and a conceptual model of excellence in physical therapist education, (2) the Carnegie Foundation's Preparation for the Professions Program (PPP), and (3) research in the learning sciences. The 30 recommendations are linked to the dimensions described in the conceptual model for excellence in physical therapist education: Culture of Excellence, Praxis of Learning, and Organizational Structures and Resources. This perspective proposes a transformative call for reform framed across 3 core categories: (1) creating a culture of excellence, leadership, and partnership, (2) advancing the learning sciences and understanding and enacting the social contract, and (3) implementing organizational imperatives. Similar to the Carnegie studies, this perspective identifies action items (9) that should be initiated immediately in a strategic and systematic way by the major organizational stakeholders in physical therapist education. These recommendations and action items provide a transformative agenda for physical therapist education, and thus the profession, in meeting the changing needs of society through higher levels of excellence.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Difusão de Inovações
Educação Profissionalizante/tendências
Modelos Educacionais
Fisioterapia/educação
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Currículo/tendências
Coleta de Dados/métodos
Seres Humanos
Liderança
Competência Profissional
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171006
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171006
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170607
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzx062


  9 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28586430
[Au] Autor:Jensen GM; Nordstrom T; Mostrom E; Hack LM; Gwyer J
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Physical Therapy, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178 (USA).
[Ti] Título:National Study of Excellence and Innovation in Physical Therapist Education: Part 1-Design, Method, and Results.
[So] Source:Phys Ther;97(9):857-874, 2017 Sep 01.
[Is] ISSN:1538-6724
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Background: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching commissioned the Preparation for the Professions Program, a qualitative study of professional education in 5 professions: medicine, nursing, law, engineering, and clergy. These studies identified curricular structures, instructional practices, assessment approaches, and environmental characteristics that support the preparation of professionals and led to educational reforms. The physical therapy profession has not had any in-depth, national investigation of physical therapist education since the Catherine Worthingham studies conducted more than 50 years ago. Objectives: This research was a Carnegie-type study, investigating elements of excellence and innovation in academic and clinical physical therapist education in the United States. Design: Five physical therapist education researchers from across the United States used a qualitative multiple-case study design. Methods: Six academic and 5 clinical programs were selected for the study. The academic institutions and clinical agencies studied were diverse in size, institutional setting, geography, and role in residency education. Qualitative case studies were generated from review of artifacts, field observations, and interviews (individual and focus group), and they provided the data for the study. Results: A conceptual framework grounded in 3 major dimensions was generated, with 8 supporting elements: (1) culture of excellence (shared beliefs and values, leadership and vision, drive for excellence, and partnerships), (2) praxis of learning (signature pedagogy, practice-based learning, creating adaptive learners, and professional formation), and (3) organizational structures and resources. Conclusion: Building on the work of the Carnegie Foundation's Preparation for the Professions Program, a conceptual model was developed, representing the dimensions and elements of excellence in physical therapist education that is centered on the foundational importance of a nexus of linked and highly valued aims of being learner centered and patient centered in all learning environments, both academic and clinical.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Difusão de Inovações
Educação Profissionalizante/tendências
Modelos Educacionais
Fisioterapia/educação
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Coleta de Dados/métodos
Seres Humanos
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Estados Unidos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171006
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171006
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170607
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzx061


  10 / 2540 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28511813
[Au] Autor:Tolkien Z; Potter S; Burr N; Gardiner MD; Blazeby JM; Jain A; Henderson J
[Ad] Endereço:Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
[Ti] Título:Conservative management of mallet injuries: A national survey of current practice in the UK.
[So] Source:J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg;70(7):901-907, 2017 Jul.
[Is] ISSN:1878-0539
[Cp] País de publicação:Netherlands
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Mallet injuries are common and usually treated conservatively. Various systematic reviews have found a lack of evidence regarding the best management, and it is unclear whether this uncertainty is reflected in current UK practice. METHODS: An online survey was developed to determine the current practice for the conservative treatment of mallet injury among specialist hand clinicians in the UK, including physiotherapists, occupational therapists and surgeons. Clinician's views of study outcome selection were also explored to improve future trials. RESULTS: In total, 336 professionals completed the survey. Inconsistency in overall practice was observed in splint type choice, time to discharge to GP, and assessment of adherence. Greater consistency was observed for recommended duration of continuous immobilisation. Bony injuries were most commonly splinted for 6 weeks (n = 228, 78%) and soft tissue injuries for either 8 weeks (n = 172, 56%) or 6 weeks (n = 119, 39%). Post-immobilisation splinting was frequently recommended, but duration varied between 2 and 10 weeks. The outcome rated as most important by all clinicians was patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION: There is overall variation in the current UK conservative management of mallet injuries, and the development of a standardised, evidence-based protocol is required. Clinicians' opinions may be used to develop a core set of outcome measures, which will improve standardisation and comparability of future trials.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Tratamento Conservador
Traumatismos dos Dedos/terapia
Padrões de Prática Médica
Polegar/lesões
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Imobilização
Terapia Ocupacional/métodos
Ortopedia/métodos
Cooperação do Paciente
Alta do Paciente
Fisioterapia/métodos
Contenções
Cirurgia Plástica/métodos
Inquéritos e Questionários
Fatores de Tempo
Reino Unido
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1708
[Cu] Atualização por classe:170823
[Lr] Data última revisão:
170823
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170518
[St] Status:MEDLINE



página 1 de 254 ir para página                         
   


Refinar a pesquisa
  Base de dados : MEDLINE Formulário avançado   

    Pesquisar no campo  
1  
2
3
 
           



Search engine: iAH v2.6 powered by WWWISIS

BIREME/OPAS/OMS - Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde