Base de dados : MEDLINE
Pesquisa : L01.178.682.099.325.500 [Categoria DeCS]
Referências encontradas : 2775 [refinar]
Mostrando: 1 .. 10   no formato [Detalhado]

página 1 de 278 ir para página                         

  1 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29362787
[Au] Autor:Grundy Q; Dunn AG; Bourgeois FT; Coiera E; Bero L
[Ad] Endereço:Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
[Ti] Título:Prevalence of Disclosed Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research and Associations With Journal Impact Factors and Altmetric Scores.
[So] Source:JAMA;319(4):408-409, 2018 01 23.
[Is] ISSN:1538-3598
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Bibliometria
Conflito de Interesses
Revelação/estatística & dados numéricos
Políticas Editoriais
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Estudos Transversais
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE; RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180311
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180311
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180125
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.20738


  2 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29298000
[Au] Autor:Aleksandrova NV; Shkolnikova MA; Dlin VV; Yugay MT
[Ti] Título:Stimulation of Research in Biomedicine. Role of Effective Contract.
[So] Source:Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk;71(5):397-405, 2016.
[Is] ISSN:0869-6047
[Cp] País de publicação:Russia (Federation)
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Background: Analysis of publication activity in the field of biomedicine shows insignificant input of Russia in the world scientific product. This is largely due to the lack of incentives for researchers. Article describes stimulation of researchers in Russia, compares it with foreign models, formulates main shortcomings of support and stimulation of research in Russia and introduces the concept of effective contract. Aims: Development of personnel motivation and stimulation of employees of scientific and research organizations in the field of health. Materials and Methods: As a successful experience the article describes the implementation of effective contract in Veltishev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics where for years remuneration of researchers depended upon their positions without consideration of research results. Effective contract brought significant changes in the traditional system setting new performance and efficiency criteria. New evaluation system took into account publication activity, presentation activity, implementation of research results, raising scientific personnel, thesis work and income-generating activities. Results: Introduction of effective contract already in the second year led to a rise in the number of foreign publications, publications in journals with impact factor of more than 2, the general increase in the number of articles in peer-reviewed journals with impact factor more than 0.3, the growth of the number of articles by 1 researcher, Hirsch index improving both by individual employees and the entire Institute, increase of grant activity and presentation activity at top-rated professional congresses. The growth of publication and presentation activities has been achieved at the reduction of research staff by 23%. From financial viewpoint effective contract resulted in the redistribution of resources in favour of more efficient researchers. Conclusions: The introduction of effective contract and increase of requirements for scientific output did not cause resistance of staff, although demanded certain time for joint development of criteria by scientific community, as well as the development and implementation of soft for continuous assessment of research activity.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Pesquisa Biomédica
Editoração
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos
Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração
Seres Humanos
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto
Editoração/organização & administração
Editoração/normas
Melhoria de Qualidade
Federação Russa
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1802
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180220
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180220
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180104
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.15690/vramn705


  3 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29293499
[Au] Autor:Bendels MHK; Müller R; Brueggmann D; Groneberg DA
[Ad] Endereço:Division of Computational Medicine, Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany.
[Ti] Título:Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.
[So] Source:PLoS One;13(1):e0189136, 2018.
[Is] ISSN:1932-6203
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:BACKGROUND: The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality research by analyzing the representation of female authorships in the last decade (from 2008 to 2016). METHODS: Based on the Gendermetrics platform, 293,557 research articles from 54 journals listed in the Nature Index were considered covering the categories Life Science, Multidisciplinary, Earth & Environmental and Chemistry. The core method was the combined analysis of the proportion of female authorships and the female-to-male odds ratio for first, co- and last authorships. The distribution of prestigious authorships was measured by the Prestige Index. RESULTS: 29.8% of all authorships and 33.1% of the first, 31.8% of the co- and 18.1% of the last authorships were held by women. The corresponding female-to-male odds ratio is 1.19 (CI: 1.18-1.20) for first, 1.35 (CI: 1.34-1.36) for co- and 0.47 (CI: 0.46-0.48) for last authorships. Women are underrepresented at prestigious authorships compared to men (Prestige Index = -0.42). The underrepresentation accentuates in highly competitive articles attracting the highest citation rates, namely, articles with many authors and articles that were published in highest-impact journals. More specifically, a large negative correlation between the 5-Year-Impact-Factor of a journal and the female representation at prestigious authorships was revealed (r(52) = -.63, P < .001). Women publish fewer articles compared to men (39.0% female authors are responsible for 29.8% of all authorships) and are underrepresented at productivity levels of more than 2 articles per author. Articles with female key authors are less frequently cited than articles with male key authors. The gender-specific differences in citation rates increase the more authors contribute to an article. Distinct differences at the journal, journal category, continent and country level were revealed. The prognosis for the next decades forecast a very slow harmonization of authorships odds between the two genders.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Autoria
Editoração
Pesquisa
Fatores Sexuais
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Feminino
Seres Humanos
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Masculino
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1802
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180215
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180215
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:180103
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0189136


  4 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29280889
[Au] Autor:Lin SJ; Chung KC; Rohrich RJ
[Ad] Endereço:Boston, Mass.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Dallas, Texas From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School; the University of Michigan Medical School; and the Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute.
[Ti] Título:Defining Outcomes Articles for the Journal.
[So] Source:Plast Reconstr Surg;141(1):239-244, 2018 01.
[Is] ISSN:1529-4242
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Bibliometria
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Cirurgia Plástica
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Avaliação de Resultados (Cuidados de Saúde)
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto
Controle de Qualidade
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180117
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180117
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171228
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003964


  5 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29287655
[Au] Autor:Prevezanos P; Tsolakis AI; Christou P
[Ad] Endereço:Department of Orthodontics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. Electronic address: orthopiraeus@gmail.com.
[Ti] Título:Highly cited orthodontic articles from 2000 to 2015.
[So] Source:Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;153(1):61-69, 2018 Jan.
[Is] ISSN:1097-6752
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:INTRODUCTION: Identification of highly cited articles based on the h-index and its properties is important for the evaluation of the past, present, and future of any research discipline. In this study, we aimed to identify the h-classic articles in orthodontics. METHODS: One search on the Web of Science identified all articles from 2000 to 2015 in the 89 journals indexed by the 2015 InCites Journal Citation Reports in the scientific area "dentistry, oral surgery, and medicine." A second search was performed in the Web of Science using all mesh terms related to orthodontics. Then, we applied the h-classic method to select the recent articles with the greatest scientific impact in orthodontics. RESULTS: Eighty articles were considered as h-classic articles. They were published in 20 of the 89 dental journals of the 2015 InCites Journal Citation Reports list. Only 36 articles appeared in orthodontic journals: 23 in the American Journal of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics (28.8%), 7 in The Angle Orthodontist (8.8%), and 6 in European Journal of Orthodontics (7.5%). Thirty-eight articles originated from Europe, 28 from the Americas, and 14 from the Middle East and Asia. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of fundamental orthodontic research is published in nonorthodontic journals showing that our field is currently limited, and interactions with other research fields should be sought to increase orthodontic research importance and appeal.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Ortodontia
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Fatores de Tempo
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180112
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180112
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:D; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171231
[St] Status:MEDLINE


  6 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29244832
[Au] Autor:Keck AS; Sloane S; Liechty JM; Fiese BH; Donovan SM
[Ad] Endereço:Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
[Ti] Título:Productivity, impact, and collaboration differences between transdisciplinary and traditionally trained doctoral students: A comparison of publication patterns.
[So] Source:PLoS One;12(12):e0189391, 2017.
[Is] ISSN:1932-6203
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Transdisciplinary (TD) approaches are increasingly used to address complex public health problems such as childhood obesity. Compared to traditional grant-funded scientific projects among established scientists, those designed around a TD, team-based approach yielded greater publication output after three to five years. However, little is known about how a TD focus throughout graduate school training may affect students' publication-related productivity, impact, and collaboration. The objective of this study was to compare the publication patterns of students in traditional versus TD doctoral training programs. Productivity, impact, and collaboration of peer-reviewed publications were compared between traditional (n = 25) and TD (n = 11) students during the first five years of the TD program. Statistical differences were determined by t-test or chi square test at p < 0.05. The publication rate for TD students was 5.2 ± 10.1 (n = 56) compared to 3.6 ± 4.5 per traditional student (n = 82). Publication impact indicators were significantly higher for TD students vs. traditional students: 5.7 times more citations in Google Scholar, 6.1 times more citations in Scopus, 1.3 times higher journal impact factors, and a 1.4 times higher journal h-index. Collaboration indicators showed that publications by TD students had significantly more co-authors (1.3 times), and significantly more disciplines represented among co-authors (1.3 times), but not significantly more organizations represented per publication compared to traditional students. In conclusion, compared to doctoral students in traditional programs, TD students published works that were accepted into higher impact journals, were more frequently cited, and had more cross-disciplinary collaborations.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Educação de Pós-Graduação
Eficiência
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Adulto
Comportamento Cooperativo
Feminino
Seres Humanos
Práticas Interdisciplinares
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Masculino
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto
Estudantes/psicologia
Adulto Jovem
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:COMPARATIVE STUDY; JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1801
[Cu] Atualização por classe:180105
[Lr] Data última revisão:
180105
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171216
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0189391


  7 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29240827
[Au] Autor:Michelessi M; Lucenteforte E; Miele A; Oddone F; Crescioli G; Fameli V; Korevaar DA; Virgili G
[Ad] Endereço:IRCSS-Fondazione G.B. Bietti, Rome, Italy.
[Ti] Título:Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An application of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.
[So] Source:PLoS One;12(12):e0189716, 2017.
[Is] ISSN:1932-6203
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:BACKGROUND: Research has shown a modest adherence of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in glaucoma to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD). We have applied the updated 30-item STARD 2015 checklist to a set of studies included in a Cochrane DTA systematic review of imaging tools for diagnosing manifest glaucoma. METHODS: Three pairs of reviewers, including one senior reviewer who assessed all studies, independently checked the adherence of each study to STARD 2015. Adherence was analyzed on an individual-item basis. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of publication year and impact factor on adherence. RESULTS: We included 106 DTA studies, published between 2003-2014 in journals with a median impact factor of 2.6. Overall adherence was 54.1% for 3,286 individual rating across 31 items, with a mean of 16.8 (SD: 3.1; range 8-23) items per study. Large variability in adherence to reporting standards was detected across individual STARD 2015 items, ranging from 0 to 100%. Nine items (1: identification as diagnostic accuracy study in title/abstract; 6: eligibility criteria; 10: index test (a) and reference standard (b) definition; 12: cut-off definitions for index test (a) and reference standard (b); 14: estimation of diagnostic accuracy measures; 21a: severity spectrum of diseased; 23: cross-tabulation of the index and reference standard results) were adequately reported in more than 90% of the studies. Conversely, 10 items (3: scientific and clinical background of the index test; 11: rationale for the reference standard; 13b: blinding of index test results; 17: analyses of variability; 18; sample size calculation; 19: study flow diagram; 20: baseline characteristics of participants; 28: registration number and registry; 29: availability of study protocol; 30: sources of funding) were adequately reported in less than 30% of the studies. Only four items showed a statistically significant improvement over time: missing data (16), baseline characteristics of participants (20), estimates of diagnostic accuracy (24) and sources of funding (30). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to STARD 2015 among DTA studies in glaucoma research is incomplete, and only modestly increasing over time.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Glaucoma/diagnóstico
Fidelidade a Diretrizes
Editoração
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Seres Humanos
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1712
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171229
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171229
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171215
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0189716


  8 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28459334
[Au] Autor:Wedzicha JA; Brochard LJ; Martinez FD; Martinez FJ; Donaldson G
[Ad] Endereço:1 Editor-in-Chief, AJRCCM.
[Ti] Título:AJRCCM: 100-Year Anniversary. The Long View and the Fast Lane.
[So] Source:Am J Respir Crit Care Med;195(9):1081-1085, 2017 May 01.
[Is] ISSN:1535-4970
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Pneumopatias
Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/história
Pneumologia
Tuberculose Pulmonar
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Aniversários e Eventos Especiais
História do Século XX
História do Século XXI
Seres Humanos
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:HISTORICAL ARTICLE; INTRODUCTORY JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1712
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171218
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171218
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:AIM; IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170502
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1164/rccm.201703-0525ED


  9 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record next record last record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:28508696
[Au] Autor:Brown T; Gutman SA; Ho YS; Fong KNK
[Ad] Endereço:a Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences , Monash University - Peninsula Campus , Frankston , VIC , Australia.
[Ti] Título:A bibliometric analysis of occupational therapy publications.
[So] Source:Scand J Occup Ther;25(1):1-14, 2018 Jan.
[Is] ISSN:1651-2014
[Cp] País de publicação:England
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:BACKGROUND: Bibliometrics involves the statistical analysis of the publications in a specific discipline or subject area. A bibliometric analysis of the occupational therapy refereed literature is needed. AIM: A bibliometric analysis was completed of the occupational therapy literature from 1991-2014, indexed in the Science Citation Index-Expanded or the Social Sciences Citation Index. METHOD: Publications were searched by title, abstract, keywords, and KeyWords Plus. Total number of article citations, citations per journal, and contributions per country, individual authors, and institution were calculated. RESULTS: 5,315 occupational therapy articles were published in 821 journals. It appears that there is a citation window of an approximate 10-year period between the time of publication and the peak number of citations an article receives. The top three most highly cited articles were published in Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, JAMA, and Lancet. AJOT, BJOT and AOTJ published the largest number of occupational therapy articles with the United States, Australia, and Canada producing the highest number of publications. McMaster University, the University of Queensland, and the University of Toronto were the institutions that published the largest number of occupational therapy journal articles. CONCLUSION: The occupational therapy literature is growing and the frequency of article citation is increasing.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Bibliometria
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Terapia Ocupacional
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Pesquisa Biomédica
Seres Humanos
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1711
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171128
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171128
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:170517
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1080/11038128.2017.1329344


  10 / 2775 MEDLINE  
              first record previous record
seleciona
para imprimir
Fotocópia
Texto completo
[PMID]:29016631
[Au] Autor:Kwon S; Solomon GEA; Youtie J; Porter AL
[Ad] Endereço:School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
[Ti] Título:A measure of knowledge flow between specific fields: Implications of interdisciplinarity for impact and funding.
[So] Source:PLoS One;12(10):e0185583, 2017.
[Is] ISSN:1932-6203
[Cp] País de publicação:United States
[La] Idioma:eng
[Ab] Resumo:Encouraging knowledge flow between mutually relevant disciplines is a worthy aim of research policy makers. Yet, it is less clear what types of research promote cross-disciplinary knowledge flow and whether such research generates particularly influential knowledge. Empirical questions remain as to how to identify knowledge-flow mediating research and how to provide support for this research. This study contributes to addressing these gaps by proposing a new way to identify knowledge-flow mediating research at the individual research article level, instead of at more aggregated levels. We identify journal articles that link two mutually relevant disciplines in three ways-aggregating, bridging, and diffusing. We then examine the likelihood that these papers receive subsequent citations or have funding acknowledgments. Our case study of cognitive science and educational research knowledge flow suggests that articles that aggregate knowledge from multiple disciplines are cited significantly more often than are those whose references are drawn primarily from a single discipline. Interestingly, the articles that meet the criteria for being considered knowledge-flow mediators are less likely to reflect funding, based on reported acknowledgements, than were those that did not meet these criteria. Based on these findings, we draw implications for research policymakers.
[Mh] Termos MeSH primário: Estudos Interdisciplinares
Conhecimento
Aprendizagem
Pesquisa
[Mh] Termos MeSH secundário: Ciência Cognitiva/tendências
Apoio Financeiro
Seres Humanos
Fator de Impacto de Revistas
Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares
[Pt] Tipo de publicação:JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Em] Mês de entrada:1710
[Cu] Atualização por classe:171031
[Lr] Data última revisão:
171031
[Sb] Subgrupo de revista:IM
[Da] Data de entrada para processamento:171011
[St] Status:MEDLINE
[do] DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185583



página 1 de 278 ir para página                         
   


Refinar a pesquisa
  Base de dados : MEDLINE Formulário avançado   

    Pesquisar no campo  
1  
2
3
 
           



Search engine: iAH v2.6 powered by WWWISIS

BIREME/OPAS/OMS - Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde